The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Canals, rivers, and the industrial city: Manchester's industrial waterfront, 1790–1850 1
Abstract
This article presents new data on mill location in Manchester in 1850 to show that water‐transport infrastructure played a key role in determining the intra‐urban pattern of factory development. The shift from water to steam power introduced new patterns of industrial water use, rather than the relocation of factories away from waterways. Five new public canals and 23 private canal branches activated a major expansion of Manchester's waterfront, providing the majority of the manufacturing sites that enabled the town to become the world's foremost factory centre. Without effective municipal water supplies, canals were the best available water source for steam engines.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Canals (Fig. 1B) and leats (ditches which specifically serve mills as either in-or outflows) have also been studied as part of power, transport, and urban histories 49 .”
From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
Output Growth and the British Industrial Revolution: A Restatement of the Crafts-Harley View
Crafts, N. F. R., & Harley, C. K. (1992) · The Economic History Review · doi:10.2307/2597415 · Cited by 568
The Economic History of Britain since 1700
Floud, R., & McCloskey, D. N. (1981) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 565
Africans and the Industrial Revolution in England
Inikori, J. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511583940 · Cited by 518
Output growth and the British industrial revolution: a restatement of the Crafts-Harley view
Crafts, N. F. R., & Harley, C. K. (1992) · The Economic History Review · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.1992.tb01313.x · Cited by 339
Shuttleworth, J. P. K. (1969) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 185
Firms, Networks and Business Values
Rose, M. B. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511522796 · Cited by 184
Steam Power and British Industrialization to 1860.
Supple, B. E., & Tunzlemann, G. N. V. (1978) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232065 · Cited by 164
A History of Water in Modern England and Wales
Hassan, J. A. (2001) · Cited by 142
The Provincial Towns of Georgian England
Chalklin, C. W. (1974) · McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1w6tb7t · Cited by 136
Factor prices and productivity growth during the British industrial revolution
Antràs, P., & Voth, H. (2003) · Explorations in Economic History · doi:10.1016/s0014-4983(02)00024-4 · Cited by 135
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Aspin C., 2003, The water spinners: a new look at the early cotton trade
- Baker H., 1871, ‘On the growth of the commercial centre of Manchester: movement of population, and pressure of habitation–census decenniad 1867–71’, Transactions of the Manchester Statistical Society, 87
- Bellhouse D., 2000, David Bellhouse & Sons, Manchester
- Brumhead D., 2005, Moving Manchester: aspects of the history of transport in the city and region since 1700, 1
- Buxton D., 1855, ‘On the rise of the manufacturing towns of Lancashire and Cheshire’, Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, 8, 199
- Farrer W., 1911, The Victoria history of the counties of England: a history of the county of Lancaster
- Gatrell V. A. C., 1977, ‘Labour, power, and the size of firms in Lancashire cotton in the second quarter of the nineteenth century’, Economic History Review, 95
- Gaulter H., 1833, The origin and progress of the malignant cholera in Manchester
- Hassan J., 1984, ‘The impact and development of the water supply in Manchester 1568–1882’, Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, 133, 25
- Haynes I., 1987, Cotton in Ashton
- Haynes I., 1990, The Stalybridge cotton mills
- Haynes I., 1993, The Dukinfield cotton mills
- Haynes I., 1996, Mossley textile mills
- Love B., 1839, The handbook of Manchester
- Miller I., 2007, A. & G. Murray and the cotton mills of Ancoats
- Milne J., 1830, A practical view of the steam engine
- Nevell M., 2008, Manchester: the hidden history
- Redding C., 1844, The pictorial history of the County of Lancaster
- Templeton W., 1854, The millwright and engineer's pocket companion
- Ure A., 1836, The cotton manufacture of Great Britain, vol. 1
- Warner F., 1920, The silk industry of the United Kingdom: its origin and development
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clifford, C., Bieroza, M., Clarke, S. J., Pickard, A., Stratigos, M. J., Hill, M. J., Raheem, N., Tatariw, C., Wood, P. J., Arismendi, I., et al. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02699-y · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Maw, P., Wyke, T., & Kidd, A.
- Affiliations
- Northumbria University (GB)
- Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
- ORCID
- Maw, Peter
- Venue
- The Economic History Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-07-19
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1495-1523
- ISSN
- 0013-0117 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0289
- OpenAlex
- W1551532454
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Economic History Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Water management and technologies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- Manchester, industrial waterfronts, canals, factory location, water transport infrastructure, steam power, industrial water use, municipal water supply, 19th-century manufacturing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review