The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators
Abstract
We analyse the determinants of the decline in research productivity using panel data on manufacturing firms in the US for the period 1980–93. We focus on three factors: the level of demand, the quality of patents and technological exhaustion. We develop an index of patent ‘quality’ using detailed patent information and show that using multiple indicators substantially reduces the measured variance in quality. Research productivity at the firm level is inversely related to patent quality and the level of demand, as predicted by theory and patent quality is positively associated with the stock market value of firms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?
Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180338 · Cited by 1,002
The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D
Pammolli, F., Magazzini, L., & Riccaboni, M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3405 · Cited by 918
Dang, J., & Motohashi, K. (2015) · China Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2015.03.012 · Cited by 638
Taxation and the International Mobility of Inventors
Akcigit, U., Baslandze, S., & Stantcheva, S. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20150237 · Cited by 428
Adopt or innovate: Understanding technological responses to cap-and-trade
Calel, R. (2020) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20180135 · Cited by 166
Topic based classification and pattern identification in patents
Venugopalan, S., & Rai, V. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.006 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M.
- Venue
- The Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 495
- Pages
- 441-465
- ISSN
- 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0297
- OpenAlex
- W2010635808
- Cited by
- 1,392
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
