Cited by 2,864Natural Resources and Economic DevelopmentCulture, Economy, and Development StudiesCorruption and Economic Development

Institutions and the Resource Curse

Open access
Mehlum, Halvor, Moene, Karl, Torvik, Ragnar·2006·The Economic Journal

Abstract

Countries rich in natural resources constitute both growth losers and growth winners. We claim that the main reason for these diverging experiences is differences in the quality of institutions. More natural resources push aggregate income down, when institutions are grabber friendly, while more resources raise income, when institutions are producer friendly. We test this theory building on Sachs and Warner’s influential works on the resource curse. Our main hypothesis – that institutions are decisive for the resource curse – is confirmed. Our results contrast the claims of Sachs and Warner that institutions do not play a role.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01045.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mehlum, Moene, and Torvik (2006) found the negative growth effect of resource richness present and larger only in countries with poor institutional quality, with a break-even point around Botswana's institutional quality.

    “Important later contributions include Mehlum, Moene, and Torvik (2006) who interact resource abundance with institutional quality and find the negative effect of resource-richness on growth to be present (and larger) only for countries with poor institutional quality, the break-even point being around the institutional quality of Botswana.”

    From Using Natural Resources for Development: Why Has It Proven So Difficult? (2016) · cites this paper as Mehlum, Moene, and Torvik (2006)

    Section 4 (Testing; page unavailable) reports a positive resource-abundance–institutional-quality interaction and says the resource curse weakens as institutional quality rises, disappearing above an index threshold of about 0.93. Section 1 (Introduction; page unavailable) describes Botswana as resource-rich with strong growth and a favorable corruption score, but does not place its institutional-quality index near that threshold. The Botswana break-even comparison is therefore unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson and J.A. Robinson (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review 91: 1369-1401.
  2. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson and J.A. Robinson (2002) An African Success: Botswana, in Dani Rodrik ed. Analytic Development Narratives , Princeton; Princeton University Press.
  3. Auty R.M. (2001) Resource Abundance and Economic Development ,Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  4. Baland, J.-M. and P. Francois. (2000) Rent-seeking and resource booms. Journal of Development Economics 61: 527-542.
  5. Engerman, S. L. and K. L. Sokoloff (2000) Institutions, factor endowments, and paths of development in the nNw World. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3): 217-232.
  6. Gelb A. (1988) Windfall Gains: Blessing or Curse? Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  7. Krugman, P. (1987) The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: notes on trade in the presence of dynamic scale economies. Journal of Development Economics 37: 41-55.
  8. Lane, F.C. (1958) Economic consequences of organized violence. Journal of Economic History 58: 401-417.
  9. Lane, P.R. and A. Tornell (1996) Power, growth and the voracity effect. Journal of Economic Growth 1: 213-241.
  10. Murphy, K., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny (1989) Industrialization and the big push. Journal of Political Economy 97: 1003-1026.
  11. Rosenstein-Rodan, (1943) Problems of Industrialisation of Eastern and SouthEastern Europe. The Economic Journal , 53(210/211): pp. 202-211.
  12. Sachs, J.D. and A.M. Warner (1997b) Sources of slow growth in African economies. Journal of African Economies 6: 335-376.
  13. Sachs, J.D. and A.M. Warner (2001) The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review 45: 827-838.
  14. Skaperdas, S. (2002) Warlord competition. Journal of Peace Research 39: 435-446.
  15. Tornell, A. and P.R. Lane (1999) The voracity effect. American Economic Review 89: 22-46.
  16. Torvik, R. (2002) Natural resources, rent seeking and welfare. Journal of Development Economics 67: 455-470.
  17. van Wijnbergen, S. (1984) The Dutch disease : a disease after all? Economic Journal 94: 41-55.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehlum, H., Moene, K., & Torvik, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo and International Peace Research Institute, Oslo
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
The Economic Journal
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
116
Issue
508
Pages
1-20
ISSN
  • 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0297
OpenAlex
W1484474409
Cited by
2,864
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 137 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 187 · 2022: 139 · 2021: 165 · 2020: 189 · 2019: 176 · 2018: 149 · 2017: 174 · 2016: 141 · 2015: 138 · 2014: 184 · 2013: 157 · 2012: 158
FWCI
158.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Economic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
Keywords
resource curse, natural resource wealth, institutional quality, economic growth, aggregate income

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review