Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,040

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Does Educational Tracking Affect Performance and Inequality? Differences‐ in‐Differences Evidence Across Countries

Hanushek, Eric A., W ößmann, Ludger·2006·The Economic Journal

Abstract

Even though some countries track students into differing‐ability schools by age 10, others keep their entire secondary‐school system comprehensive. To estimate the effects of such institutional differences in the face of country heterogeneity, we employ an international differences‐in‐differences approach. We identify tracking effects by comparing differences in outcome between primary and secondary school across tracked and non‐tracked systems. Six international student assessments provide eight pairs of achievement contrasts for between 18 and 26 cross‐country comparisons. The results suggest that early tracking increases educational inequality. While less clear, there is also a tendency for early tracking to reduce mean performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01076.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,040

Metadata

Authors
Hanushek, E. A., & W ößmann, L.
Venue
The Economic Journal
Published
2006-02-28
Volume
116
Issue
510
Pages
C63-C76
ISSN
  • 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0297
OpenAlex
W3122436209
Cited by
1,040
References
0
FWCI
151.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Educational Tracking Affect Performance and Inequality? Differences‐ in‐Differences Evidence Across Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01076.x
The paper
Hanushek, E. A., & W ößmann, L. (2006). Does Educational Tracking Affect Performance and Inequality? Differences‐ in‐Differences Evidence Across Countries. The Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01076.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.