The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Institutionalization of Private Governance: How Business and Nonprofit Organizations Agree on Transnational Rules
Open accessAbstract
This article assesses the recent trend of cooperation among antagonistic private actors that results in the creation and implementation of issue‐specific transnational norms and rules and the subsequent shift from public to private forms of governance. Many political scientists agree that authority also exists outside of formal political structures. Private actors increasingly begin to make their own rules and standards that acquire authority beyond the international system. This observation is often referred to as private transnational governance as opposed to public or international governance. Although the concept of private governance gains prominence in academic debates, it is not clear how private governance on the global scale is constructed and maintained or what specific or general conditions are necessary for private governance to emerge. Based on the review of common theoretical propositions, this article develops an integrated model along which the necessary conditions for the emergence of private governance can be assessed and understood. As most research has hitherto focused on institutionalized cooperation between business actors (self‐regulation), this article takes a closer look at those transnational systems of rule that result out of the enhanced cooperation between profit and nonprofit actors (coregulation).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081898550789 · Cited by 8,292
Cited by
Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes
Black, J. (2008) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x · Cited by 1,215
The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct: Achievements and Limitations
Vogel, D. (2010) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650309343407 · Cited by 580
Earth system governance: a research framework
Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Schroeder, H., Siebenhüner, B., & Zondervan, R. (2010) · International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-010-9137-3 · Cited by 371
Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework
Biermann, F., & Gupta, A. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.008 · Cited by 339
Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century
Pattberg, P., & Stripple, J. (2008) · International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-008-9085-3 · Cited by 313
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- PATTBERG, P.
- Venue
- Governance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-18
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 589-610
- ISSN
- 0952-1895 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0491
- OpenAlex
- W2032211973
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Institutionalization of Private Governance: How Business and Nonprofit Organizations Agree on Transnational Rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00293.x
- The paper
- PATTBERG, P. (2005). The Institutionalization of Private Governance: How Business and Nonprofit Organizations Agree on Transnational Rules. Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00293.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.