The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EFNS guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain
Abstract
Pharmacological relief of neuropathic pain is often insufficient. Electrical neurostimulation is efficacious in chronic neuropathic pain and other neurological diseases. European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) launched a Task Force to evaluate the evidence for these techniques and to produce relevant recommendations. We searched the literature from 1968 to 2006, looking for neurostimulation in neuropathic pain conditions, and classified the trials according to the EFNS scheme of evidence for therapeutic interventions. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is efficacious in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I (level B recommendation). High‐frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) may be better than placebo (level C) although worse than electro‐acupuncture (level B). One kind of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has transient efficacy in central and peripheral neuropathic pains (level B). Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is efficacious in central post‐stroke and facial pain (level C). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) should only be performed in experienced centres. Evidence for implanted peripheral stimulations is inadequate. TENS and r‐TMS are non‐invasive and suitable as preliminary or add‐on therapies. Further controlled trials are warranted for SCS in conditions other than failed back surgery syndrome and CRPS and for MCS and DBS in general. These chronically implanted techniques provide satisfactory pain relief in many patients, including those resistant to medication or other means.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Farrar, J. T., Young, J. P., LaMoreaux, L., Werth, J. L., & Poole, M. R. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00349-9 · Cited by 5,808
Cited by
Lefaucheur, J.-P., André-Obadia, N., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Cantello, R. M., Cincotta, M., de Carvalho, M., De Ridder, D., et al. (2014) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021 · Cited by 2,119
Self-citationNeuropathic pain: diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment
Baron, R., Binder, A., & Wasner, G. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70143-5 · Cited by 1,816
Treatment of neuropathic pain: an overview of recent guidelines.
O'Connor, A. B., & Dworkin, R. H. (2009) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.007 · Cited by 781
O'Connor (2009) · doi:10.2165/00019053-200927020-00002 · Cited by 438
Eldabe, S., Buchser, E., & Duarte, R. V. (2016) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnv025 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Cruccu, G., Aziz, T. Z., Garcia‐Larrea, L., Hansson, P., Jensen, T. S., Lefaucheur, J. ‐., Simpson, B. A., & Taylor, R. S.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-20
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 952-970
- ISSN
- 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-1331
- OpenAlex
- W2169649768
- Cited by
- 690
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EFNS guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01916.x
- The paper
- Cruccu, G., Aziz, T. Z., Garcia‐Larrea, L., Hansson, P., Jensen, T. S., Lefaucheur, J. ‐., Simpson, B. A., & Taylor, R. S. (2007). EFNS guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain. European Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01916.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.