The DOI matches its Crossref record.
‘Policies in Motion’, Urban Management and State Restructuring: The Trans‐Local Expansion of Business Improvement Districts
Abstract
This article examines the ways in which business improvement districts are being introduced into UK cities. In advancing this analysis, the focus here is on the means through which one or two Manhattan business improvement districts have been constructed as ‘models’ of urban management, taken out of their particular local/regional and national contexts and introduced into a diverse set of local political economic contexts in UK cities and towns. Examining the way business improvement districts have become a policy in motion, the article sketches out the emergence of entrepreneurial urban governance arrangements in the UK as part of the state's changing spatiality in the industrialized economies of Western Europe and North America. I argue that these changes make UK cities and towns increasingly receptive to the business improvement district model of downtown management. Seeking to move beyond the sometimes rather one‐sided representations of policies that find themselves on the move, the article seeks to connect the ‘exporting’ and ‘importing’ zones of policy transfer, arguing for an open and permeable conceptualization of these places. It draws on work in Manhattan, New York to unpack the nature of the political–economic relations that business improvement districts were part of, before moving on to examine the dynamics of policy transfer and the early days of the introduction of this downtown ‘model’ into UK cities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space
McFarlane, C. (2011) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d4710 · Cited by 746
The Comparative City: Knowledge, Learning, Urbanism
MCFARLANE, C. (2010) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00917.x · Cited by 493
González, S. (2011) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098010374510 · Cited by 438
Comparative Urbanism: New Geographies and Cultures of Theorizing the Urban
Robinson, J. (2016) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12273 · Cited by 432
The geography of gentrification: Thinking through comparative urbanism
Lees, L. (2012) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132511412998 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- WARD, K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-75
- ISSN
- 0309-1317 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2427
- OpenAlex
- W1978839234
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Policies in Motion’, Urban Management and State Restructuring: The Trans‐Local Expansion of Business Improvement Districts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00643.x
- The paper
- WARD, K. (2006). ‘Policies in Motion’, Urban Management and State Restructuring: The Trans‐Local Expansion of Business Improvement Districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00643.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.