Cited by 495Energy, Environment, Economic GrowthPolitical Theory and DemocracyPolitical Conflict and Governance

Democracy and Environmental Degradation

LI, QUAN, REUVENY, RAFAEL·2006·International Studies Quarterly

Abstract

In a relatively small but growing body of literature in political science and environmental studies, scholars debate the effect of democracy on environmental degradation. Some theorists claim that democracy reduces environmental degradation. Others argue that democracy may not reduce environmental degradation or may even harm the environment. Empirical evidence thus far has been limited and conflicting. This article seeks to address the democracy–environment debate. We focus on the effect of political regime type on human activities that directly damage the environment. Our discussion of the theoretical literature identifies different causal mechanisms through which democracy could affect environmental degradation. The empirical analysis focuses on the net effect of these competing mechanisms. We examine statistically the effect of democracy on five aspects of human-induced environmental degradation—carbon dioxide emissions, nitrogen dioxide emissions, deforestation, land degradation, and organic pollution in water. We find that democracy reduces all five types of environmental degradation. While the substantive effect of democracy is considerable, it varies in size across different types of environmental degradation. We also find nonmonotonic effects of democracy that vary across the environmental indicators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00432.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 495

Authors
LI, Q., & REUVENY, R.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Indiana University (US)
Venue
International Studies Quarterly
Published
2006-12
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
935-956
ISSN
  • 0020-8833 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2478
OpenAlex
W2048847440
Cited by
495
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 16
FWCI
17.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Studies Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
democracy, environmental degradation, political regime type, CO2 emissions, nitrogen dioxide emissions, deforestation, land degradation, water pollution, organic pollution, causal mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review