Democracy and Environmental Degradation
Abstract
In a relatively small but growing body of literature in political science and environmental studies, scholars debate the effect of democracy on environmental degradation. Some theorists claim that democracy reduces environmental degradation. Others argue that democracy may not reduce environmental degradation or may even harm the environment. Empirical evidence thus far has been limited and conflicting. This article seeks to address the democracy–environment debate. We focus on the effect of political regime type on human activities that directly damage the environment. Our discussion of the theoretical literature identifies different causal mechanisms through which democracy could affect environmental degradation. The empirical analysis focuses on the net effect of these competing mechanisms. We examine statistically the effect of democracy on five aspects of human-induced environmental degradation—carbon dioxide emissions, nitrogen dioxide emissions, deforestation, land degradation, and organic pollution in water. We find that democracy reduces all five types of environmental degradation. While the substantive effect of democracy is considerable, it varies in size across different types of environmental degradation. We also find nonmonotonic effects of democracy that vary across the environmental indicators.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Democracies are associated with superior environmental protection.
“Democracies also are associated with superior environmental protection (61).”
From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [61]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 495
- Authors
- LI, Q., & REUVENY, R.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Indiana University (US)
- ORCID
- LI, QUAN
- Venue
- International Studies Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 935-956
- ISSN
- 0020-8833 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2478
- OpenAlex
- W2048847440
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 17.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Studies Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- democracy, environmental degradation, political regime type, CO2 emissions, nitrogen dioxide emissions, deforestation, land degradation, water pollution, organic pollution, causal mechanisms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review