Cited by 18Skin Protection and AgingFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesDermatologic Treatments and Research

Evaluation of the effects of a preparation containing asiaticoside on periocular wrinkles of human volunteers

Lee, J., Jung, E., Lee, H., Seo, Y., Koh, J., Park, D.·2008·International Journal of Cosmetic Science

Abstract

Synopsis: Skin ageing is accompanied by wrinkle formation. In particular, periorbital wrinkle formation is a relatively early sign of skin ageing. We evaluated the effects of a preparation containing asiaticoside on the periorbital wrinkles of a group of volunteers. The effectiveness of the active compound, asiaticoside, in a base‐cream preparation for the treatment of temporal periorbital wrinkles was tested on 27 female volunteers as follows: the women applied the cream twice a day to the region of interest for 12 weeks. Same women also applied a vehicle control cream to the periorbital skin around the other eye. Negative replicas were taken of the periorbital skin before treatment and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after application of the cream. The results were evaluated by semi‐automated morphometry of the plastic replicas. After 12 weeks of treatment, there was a significant improvement of the periorbital wrinkles in majority of the volunteers who tested the cream. Of the 27 women examined with periocular wrinkles, 65% showed an improvement at the end of the treatment. In three cases, the improvement was 100% (disappearance of the crow’s feet), 75% ± 1.97 and 79% ± 2.82. On six eyes, there was no significant change after the treatment. With 12 weeks of treatment with the asiaticoside‐containing cream, most of the periorbital wrinkles were attenuated to some degree, and some women experienced a significant improvement of the periorbital wrinkles on one of their eyes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00440.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 18

Authors
Lee, J., Jung, E., Lee, H., Seo, Y., Koh, J., & Park, D.
Affiliations
International Life Sciences Institute Europe (BE)
Corresponding author
  • Jung, E.
  • Park, D.
Venue
International Journal of Cosmetic Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-30
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
167-173
ISSN
  • 0142-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2494
OpenAlex
W1967496208
Cited by
18
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cosmetic Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
asiaticoside, periorbital wrinkles, crow's feet, skin aging, topical cream, skin morphometry, plastic replicas
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Emollients, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Triterpenes, Skin Aging, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review