The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Skeptical American: Revisiting the Meanings of Trust in Government and Confidence in Institutions
Abstract
This paper critically analyzes the survey literature on trust in government and confidence in institutions. It highlights the gap between theoretical understandings of trust which encompass trust, lack of trust, and distrust, next to empirical realizations which fail to consider active distrust of government. Using a specially tailored survey designed for this project, the paper is the first which directly compares competing operationalizations of trust and distrust. The most frequently used measures, both from the National Election Studies and the General Social Survey, tend to exaggerate the level of disaffection compared to a new measure especially designed to run from active trust, which anticipates that the government will do the right thing, to active distrust, the expectation that it will do the wrong thing. Multivariate analyses reveal statistically significant differences in the underlying determinants of these measures. The conventional NES measure in particular is more influenced by short-term evaluations of political events and leaders; our new measure of active trust/distrust taps a more deeply seated orientation toward government.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2454 · Cited by 28,789
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,442
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,277
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3597 · Cited by 5,186
The Moral Foundations of Trust
Uslaner, E. M. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614934 · Cited by 2,836
Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital
Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111684 · Cited by 2,421
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1460 · Cited by 1,617
The Political Relevance of Political Trust
Hetherington, M. J. (1998) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586304 · Cited by 1,539
Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970
Miller, A. H. (1974) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1959140 · Cited by 1,437
Cited by
Political Trust in a Cynical Age
Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550 · Cited by 722
The Effect of Transparency on Trust in Government: A Cross‐National Comparative Experiment
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12047 · Cited by 608
Validating a Scale for Citizen Trust in Government Organizations
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Knies, E. (2017) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852315585950 · Cited by 366
Citizens’ Use of Social Media in Government, Perceived Transparency, and Trust in Government
Song, C., & Lee, J. (2016) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798 · Cited by 331
Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095 · Cited by 227
“They might even expect the government and the mainstream parties to worsen the problems that society is facing (Citrin & Stoker, 2018; Cook & Gronke, 2005).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, T. E., & Gronke, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Politics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 784-803
- ISSN
- 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2508
- OpenAlex
- W2148097253
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 35.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Skeptical American: Revisiting the Meanings of Trust in Government and Confidence in Institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00339.x
- The paper
- Cook, T. E., & Gronke, P. (2005). The Skeptical American: Revisiting the Meanings of Trust in Government and Confidence in Institutions. The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00339.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.