It is not what you have; it is what you do with it: Support for Addis's gendered responding framework.
Abstract
Depression in men is a critical topic but unfortunately there has been more rhetoric than research on the nature, extent, and treatment of depression in men. Many of the models of depression in men are based on a medical model view of “big D” depression. Addis's gendered responding framework provides an innovative perspective on depression in men that has important implications for theories, research, and clinical interventions. Additional support for Addis's model is provided from existing studies on substance use as a response to negative affect and gender differences in rumination, and from new results presented here.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher rates of male suicide in most countries and much higher rates of drug and alcohol abuse suggest that men may deal with mental health issues and distress differently to women.
“higher rates of male suicide in most countries (Payne et al. , 2008; ONS, 2009) as well as much higher rates of drug and alcohol abuse (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2008; Oliffe and Philips, 2008; Ridge et al. , 2010) suggest that men may deal with mental health issues and distress differently to women.”
From Do depressed and anxious men do groups? What works and what are the barriers to help seeking? (2014) · cites this paper as Nolen-Hoeksema, 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 19 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Nolen-Hoeksema, S.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 178-181
- ISSN
- 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2850
- OpenAlex
- W2072301297
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
- Keywords
- male depression, gender differences in depression, rumination, substance use as coping, negative affect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
