The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Humor as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication
Abstract
The compelling power of humor makes it a recurrent topic for research in many fields, including communication. Three theories of humor creation emerge in humor research: the relief theory, which focuses on physiological release of tension; the incongruity theory, singling out violations of a rationally learned pattern; and the superiority theory, involving a sense of victory or triumph. Each theory helps to explain the creation of different aspects of humor, but each runs into problems explaining rhetorical applications of humor. Because each theory of humor origin tries to explain all instances of humor, the diverging communication effects of humor remain unexplained. Humor's enactment leads to 4 basic functions of humor in communication. Two tend to unite communicators: the identification and the clarification functions. The other 2 tend to divide 1 set of communicators from others: the enforcement and differentiation functions. Exploration of these effects-based functions of humor will clarify understanding of its use in messages. Humor use unites communicators through mutual identification and clarification of positions and values, while dividing them through enforcement of norms and differentiation of acceptable versus unacceptable behaviors or people. This paradox in the functions of humor in communication as, alternately, a unifier and divider, allows humor use to delineate social boundaries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
VEATCH, T. C. (1998) · humr · doi:10.1515/humr.1998.11.2.161 · Cited by 341
Cited by
Cauberghe, V., Van Wesenbeeck, I., De Jans, S., Hudders, L., & Ponnet, K. (2021) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0478 · Cited by 564
Alexa, what do we know about conversational commerce? Insights from a systematic literature review.
Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., Verma, S., & Chaturvedi, R. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21654 · Cited by 293
A taxonomy of value co-creation on Weibo – a communication perspective
Ge, J., & Gretzel, U. (2018) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-09-2016-0557 · Cited by 65
How does travel social media influencer humour influence viewers’ visit intention?
Li, F. (., & Zhou, Z. (2024) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2023.2291114 · Cited by 39
Nasreen, Z. (2021) · Society and Culture in South Asia · doi:10.1177/2393861720977632 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, J. C.
- Venue
- Communication Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 310-331
- ISSN
- 1050-3293 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2885
- OpenAlex
- W2053975651
- Cited by
- 879
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Humor as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00194.x
- The paper
- Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication. Communication Theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00194.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.