The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Civic Engagement From a Communication Infrastructure Perspective
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to articulate the concepts and assumptions of communication infrastructure theory (CIT) in its present stage of development and validation. As an ecological approach to communication and community, CIT claims that access to storytelling community resources is a critical factor in civic engagement. When embedded in a neighborhood environment where key community storytellers encourage each other to talk about the neighborhood, individual residents are more likely to belong to their community, to have a strong sense of collective efficacy, and to participate in civic actions. CIT framework offers a way to examine the ecological processes that concern the effects of communication resources on civic community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Storytelling Neighborhood: Paths to Belonging in Diverse Urban Environments
BALL-ROKEACH, S. J., KIM, Y.-C., & MATEI, S. (2001) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365001028004003 · Cited by 383 · cited 11×
“Based on data drawn from about a dozen ethnic and geographical communities in Los Angeles, we have cumulatively developed the concept and study of communication infrastructures for civic engagement in contemporary urban spaces ( Ball-Rokeach, Kim, & Matei, 2001 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, Y.-C., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J.
- Venue
- Communication Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-197
- ISSN
- 1050-3293 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2885
- OpenAlex
- W2057130758
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
