The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sunscreens in human plasma and urine after repeated whole‐body topical application
Abstract
Background The three chemical ultraviolet absorbers benzophenone‐3 (BP‐3), octyl‐methoxycinnamate (OMC) and 3‐(4‐methylbenzylidene) camphor (4‐MBC) are commercially used in sunscreens worldwide. Apart from sun protection, they may possess endocrine‐disrupting effects in animals and in vitro. For all three compounds, only sporadic measurements of percutaneous absorption and excretion after topical application in humans have been described. Methods In this study, 32 healthy volunteers, 15 young males and 17 postmenopausal females, were exposed to daily whole‐body topical application of 2 mg/cm 2 of sunscreen formulation at 10% (w/w) of each for 4 days. Blood concentrations were measured at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 24 and 96 h and urine concentrations at 0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. Results Almost all three sunscreens were undetectable in plasma and urine before the first application. One to 2 h after the first application, all three sunscreens were detectable in plasma. The maximum median plasma concentrations were 187 ng/mL BP‐3, 16 ng/mL 4‐MBC and 7 ng/mL OMC for females and 238 ng/mL BP‐3, 18 ng/mL 4‐MBC and 16 ng/mL OMC for men. In the females, urine levels of 44 ng/mL BP‐3 and 4 ng/mL of 4‐MBC and 6 ng/mL OMC were found, and in the males, urine levels of 81 ng/mL BP‐3, 4 ng/mL of 4‐MBC and OMC were found. In plasma, the 96‐h median concentrations were higher compared with the 24‐h concentrations for 4‐MBC and OMC in men and for BP‐3 and 4‐MBC in females.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Janjua, N. R., Mogensen, B., Andersson, A.-M., Petersen, J. H., Henriksen, M., Skakkebæk, N. E., & Wulf, H. C. (2004) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-202x.2004.22725.x · Cited by 338
Self-citationChanges in ultraviolet absorption of sunscreens after ultraviolet irradiation
Tarras-Wahlberg, N., Rosén, A., Stenhagen, G., Larkö, O., Wennberg, A.-M., & Wennerström, O. (1999) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00721.x · Cited by 172
Paluska, S. A. (2003) · Current Sports Medicine Reports · doi:10.1249/00149619-200308000-00008 · Cited by 105
Cited by
Darbre, P. D., & Harvey, P. W. (2008) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.1358 · Cited by 697
Krause, M., Klit, A., Blomberg Jensen, M., Søeborg, T., Frederiksen, H., Schlumpf, M., Lichtensteiger, W., Skakkebaek, N. E., & Drzewiecki, K. T. (2012) · International Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2012.01280.x · Cited by 461
Sunscreens: An overview and update
Sambandan, D. R., & Ratner, D. (2011) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.01.005 · Cited by 365
Matta, M. K., Zusterzeel, R., Pilli, N. R., Patel, V., Volpe, D. A., Florian, J., Oh, L., Bashaw, E., Zineh, I., Sanabria, C., et al. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.5586 · Cited by 335
Neurotoxic effect of active ingredients in sunscreen products, a contemporary review
Ruszkiewicz, J. A., Pinkas, A., Ferrer, B., Peres, T. V., Tsatsakis, A., & Aschner, M. (2017) · Toxicology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.05.006 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Janjua, N., Kongshoj, B., Andersson, A., & Wulf, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-23
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 456-461
- ISSN
- 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3083
- OpenAlex
- W2076155506
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sunscreens in human plasma and urine after repeated whole‐body topical application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02492.x
- The paper
- Janjua, N., Kongshoj, B., Andersson, A., & Wulf, H. (2008). Sunscreens in human plasma and urine after repeated whole‐body topical application. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02492.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.