Attention and Vigilance in Children with down Syndrome.
Abstract
Background Down syndrome (DS) has been the focus of much cognitive and developmental research; however, there is a gap in knowledge regarding sustained attention, particularly across different sensory domains. This research examined the hypothesis that children with DS would demonstrate superior visual rather than auditory performance on a sustained attention task and that this modality difference would not be seen in children with non‐specific intellectual disability (NSID). Materials and Methods Eleven children with DS and 16 children with NSID were compared on two versions of the sustained attention to response test (SART), varying only in presentation modality (visual or auditory). Errors of commission (failure to withhold response to target) and errors of omission (failure to respond to non‐target distractors) were recorded. Results Significant group differences were found in the visual modality and mental age was also found to effect error rates in the visual condition. No effect of group or mental age was observed in the auditory SART. Conclusions Results suggest that, for individuals with DS, presentation of education material in a visual medium may facilitate sustained attention and thus learning. Further research using tools such as the SART to explore modality differences in sustained attention and additional cognitive domains is recommended.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Executive functioning impairments in Down syndrome include deficits in attention, inhibition, planning and organization, set-shifting, and self-monitoring.
“The impairments in executive functioning include deficits in attention, inhibition, planning and organization, set-shifting, and self-monitoring, all of which are critical categories of intellectual function needed for independent living (Cornish et al., 2007; Abbeduto et al., 2008; Trezise et al., 2008; Lanfranchi et al., 2010; Breckenridge et al., 2013; Costanzo et al., 2013).”
From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Trezise et al., 2008
Cites
Frontal lesions and sustained attention
Wilkins, A. J., Shallice, T., & McCarthy, R. (1987) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(87)90024-8 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Manly, T., Owen, A. M., McAvinue, L., Datta, A., Lewis, G. H., Scott, S. K., Rorden, C., Pickard, J., & Robertson, I. H. (2003) · Neurocase · doi:10.1076/neur.9.4.340.15553 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models
Klein, J. A., & Haydar, T. F. (2022) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2022.941855 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“The impairments in executive functioning include deficits in attention, inhibition, planning and organization, setshifting, and self-monitoring, all of which are critical categories of intellectual function needed for independent living (Cornish et al., 2007; Abbeduto et al., 2008; Trezise et al., 2008; Lanfranchi et…”
Background
- Authors
- Trezise, K. L., Gray, K. M., & Sheppard, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-13
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 502-508
- ISSN
- 0952-9608 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-2322
- 1468-3148
- OpenAlex
- W2082675348
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Keywords
- Down syndrome, sustained attention, presentation modality, Sustained Attention to Response Task, mental age, children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review