CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 645China's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceModernity and Self-IdentityChinese history and philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Chinese path to individualization

Yan, Yunxiang·2010·The British Journal of Sociology
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01323.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article explores the rise of the individual and the consequential individualization of society which should be viewed as a reflexive part of China's state‐sponsored quest for modernity. It traces the origin of the individualization process to the Maoist era, arguing that some collectivist programmes of social engineering and the socialist path of modernization under Maoism ironically resulted in a partial individualization of Chinese society. Examining profound social changes during the three decades of the post‐Mao reforms, the article reveals a number of similarities with the individualization process in Western Europe but also demonstrates some important differences. In the last section, the theoretical implications of the Chinese case in light of Ulrich Beck's theory of individualization and second modernity are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01323.x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Fei Xiaotong, 1948, Xiangtu Zhongguo (Folk China)
  2. Ong Aihwa, 2008, Privatizing China: Socialism from Afar
  3. Palmer Michael, 2006, Consuming China: Approaches to Cultural Change in Contemporary China
  4. Wedell‐Wedellsborg Anne, 2010, iChina: The Rise of the Individual in Modern Chinese Society
  5. Wu Xiaobo, 2007, Jidang sanshinian: Zhongguo qiye 1978–2008
  6. Yan Yunxiang, 1994, China Review 1994
  7. Yan Yunxiang, 2010, iChina: The Rise of the Individual in Modern Chinese Society
  8. Zhou Yongming, 2008, Privatizing China: Socialism from Afar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 645

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Yan, Y.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Yan, Yunxiang
ORCID
Yan, Yunxiang
Venue
The British Journal of Sociology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
489-512
ISSN
  • 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4446
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01323.x
OpenAlex
W1789051580
Cited by
639
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
FWCI
101.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 13 d)
Locations
  • British Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Modernity and Self-Identity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
Keywords
individualization, Chinese society, modernization, Maoism, collectivism, social engineering, post-Mao reforms, Ulrich Beck, second modernity, Western Europe comparison, individual and state
MeSH terms
China, Employment, Humans, Individuality, Politics, Self Concept, Social Change, Social Environment, Socialism, Personal Autonomy, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review