The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generations of Decline: Religious Change in 20th‐Century Britain
Abstract
This article analyzes the best available evidence from the major British social surveys to describe and explain the continuous decline of religion throughout the 20th century. This decline is overwhelmingly generational in nature rather than a product of particular periods such as World War II or the 1960s. Measures of religious affiliation, regular attendance at worship, and religious belief show nearly identical rates of intergenerational decline. Decline has not been offset by any positive age effects in an aging society: Britons do not get more religious as they get older. The intergenerational decline follows clear patterns of transmission of parental religious characteristics to children. Two potential modulators of decline are identified and investigated: immigration of people who are more religious than the existing population and higher fertility rates among the religiously active population. Of these only the former appears of importance. The nonwhite ethnic minority immigrant population is far more religious than the white population; however, the rates of intergenerational decline (between immigrant parents and native‐born children) are almost as high as for the white population, leading to an intergenerational convergence of levels of religiosity. Although ethnic minority populations tend to be more religious and have higher fertility rates, there is no differential fertility by religiosity among the population as a whole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge.
Barber, B., Mannheim, K., & Kecskemeti, P. (1953) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2087567 · Cited by 2,282
Sacred and secular religion and politics worldwide
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004) · Cited by 2,251
Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791017 · Cited by 1,795
God is dead: secularization in the West
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1477 · Cited by 1,476
Religion in Britain Since 1945. Believing without Belonging
Flanagan, K., & Davie, G. (1995) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/591583 · Cited by 1,401
Sacred and Secular: The Consequences of Secularization
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004) · Cited by 1,142
Religion in Britain: Neither Believing nor Belonging
Voas, D., & Crockett, A. (2005) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038505048998 · Cited by 572
Self-citationThe Death of Christian Britain
Brown, C. G. (2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203879436 · Cited by 483
Is Religious Belief Declining in Britain?
Gill, R., Hadaway, C. K., & Marler, P. L. (1998) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1388057 · Cited by 116
A turning point in religious evolution in europe1>
Lambert, Y. (2004) · Journal of Contemporary Religion · doi:10.1080/1353790032000165104 · Cited by 107
Cited by
Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003 · Cited by 544
Is the United States a Counterexample to the Secularization Thesis?
Voas, D., & Chaves, M. (2016) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/684202 · Cited by 485
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- CROCKETT, A., & VOAS, D.
- Venue
- Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-22
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 567-584
- ISSN
- 0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5906
- OpenAlex
- W2063288385
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 21.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generations of Decline: Religious Change in 20th‐Century Britain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00328.x
- The paper
- CROCKETT, A., & VOAS, D. (2006). Generations of Decline: Religious Change in 20th‐Century Britain. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00328.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.