Cited by 184Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyContemporary Christian Leadership and EducationReligion and Society Interactions

Negative Life Events, Patterns of Positive and Negative Religious Coping, and Psychological Functioning

BJORCK, JEFFREY P., THURMAN, JOHN W.·2007·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

Religious coping may or may not be adaptive depending upon whether such coping is positive or negative. We investigated the potential moderating effects of positive and negative religious coping patterns on the relationship between negative life events and psychological functioning. Questionnaires included measures of negative life events, positive and negative religious coping, and psychological functioning, and were completed by 336 adult, Protestant church members. Even after controlling for religious participation, negative events were related to increased use of positive and negative religious coping and decreased psychological functioning. Moreover, negative events and positive religious coping produced an interaction effect on depression, such that the high use of positive religious coping buffered the deleterious effects of negative events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00348.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive religious coping behaviors such as turning to prayer or finding meaning in difficult situations may translate into reduced risk for longer-term mental health problems.

    “Further, one's faith and the use of positive religious coping behaviors such as turning to prayer or finding meaning in difficult situations (e.g., Bjorck et al. 2007; Mahamid & Bdier, 2021) may similarly translate into reduced risk for longer-term mental health problems.”

    From I've Seen Enough: Measuring the Toll of Content Moderation on Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as Bjorck et al. 2007

  • When religion forms part of how people cope, the outcome can be positive.

    “When religion forms part of how people cope, the outcome can be positive (see Bjorck & Thurman 2007:159;Vandecreek et al. 2004:50;Wasserman, Weisman & Suro 2013:16).”

    From https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i3.4525 · cites this paper as Bjorck & Thurman 2007:159

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 184

Authors
BJORCK, J. P., & THURMAN, J. W.
Affiliations
Fuller Theological Seminary (US)
Corresponding author
  • BJORCK, JEFFREY P.
  • THURMAN, JOHN W.
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-15
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
159-167
ISSN
  • 0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5906
OpenAlex
W2088659418
Cited by
184
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religious coping, positive religious coping, negative religious coping, negative life events, psychological functioning, depression, buffering effect, moderating effect, religious participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review