The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Professional Codes of Practice and Ethical Conduct
Abstract
ABSTRACT This essay is an attempt to examine the idea that a professional code of practice can entail ethical conduct. It is focused around two differing perspectives on ethics. It will be argued that the professions have, perhaps too hastily, adopted one theory without considering the merits, or the objections offered by the alternative account. This alternative, a ‘cognitivist’ theory, is sketched, and the possible advantages of such an approach are discussed. Such a perspective means adopting a radically different approach to the nature of ethics and what it is to be a moral agent, and could have interesting consequences for professional practice. Even if a cognitivist account is ultimately unconvincing, it does provide a number of worrying arguments for those professionals who believe that ethical conduct is generated by following a code of practice, and these arguments need to be addressed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, regulation can lead to uniformity and normalizing codes of ethics and practice which, as Dawson (2008) argues, can be blunt instruments in creating true ethical practice.”
From Having Burned the Straw Man of Christian Spiritual Leadership, what can We Learn from Jesus About Leading Ethically? (2017) · cites this paper as Dawson 2008
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Phillips M., 1985, Doctor's Dilemmas, 190
- Brazier M., 1987, Medicine, Patients and the Law
- Beauchamp T., 1983, Principles ofBiomedical Ethics, 5
- 10.5840/monist197962319 · DOI
- Wittgenstein L., 1953, Philosophical Investigations
- Mason J., 1987, Law and Medical Ethics, 321
- Mackie J., 1977, Ethics: Inventing Right & Wrong, 38
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mabey, C., Conroy, M., Blakeley, K., & de Marco, S. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3054-5 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- DAWSON, A. J.
- Corresponding author
- DAWSON, ANGUS JAMES
- ORCID
- DAWSON, ANGUS JAMES
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Philosophy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-153
- ISSN
- 0264-3758 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5930
- OpenAlex
- W2109656191
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
- Keywords
- moral behavior, moral agency, nature of ethics, professional ethics, professional practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Professional Codes of Practice and Ethical Conduct. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-5930.1994.tb00104.x
- The paper
- DAWSON, A. J. (1994). Professional Codes of Practice and Ethical Conduct. Journal of Applied Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.1994.tb00104.x