Issues in the Pharmacological Induction of Emotions
Abstract
In this paper, we examine issues raised by the possibility of regulating emotions through pharmacological means. We argue that emotions induced through these means can be authentic phenomenologically, and that the manner of inducing them need not make them any less our own than emotions arising ‘naturally’. We recognize that in taking drugs to induce emotions, one may lose opportunities for self‐knowledge; act narcissistically; or treat oneself as a mere means. But we propose that there are circumstances in which none of these concerns arise. Finally, we consider how the possibility of drug‐regulation might affect duties to feel emotions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If using an eBCI aligns with an individual's endorsed values, there is no apparent reason to believe that one is less authentic when an eBCI is installed.
“From this perspective, if using an eBCI aligns with an individual’s endorsed values, there is no apparent reason to believe that one is less authentic when an eBCI is installed [62].”
From Ethical considerations for the use of brain–computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement (2024) · cites this paper as [62]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ethical considerations for the use of brain–computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement
Gordon, E. C., & Seth, A. K. (2024) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002899 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- WASSERMAN, D., & LIAO, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Yeshiva University (US)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- WASSERMAN, DAVID
- LIAO, S. MATTHEW
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Philosophy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 178-192
- ISSN
- 0264-3758 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5930
- OpenAlex
- W2133155930
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- emotion regulation, phenomenology of emotion, self-knowledge, narcissism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review