Cited by 106Bacterial Infections and VaccinesBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingNeonatal and Maternal Infections

Simultaneous single-tube PCR assay for the detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae type b and Streptococcus pneumoniae

Open access
Tzanakaki, G., Tsopanomichalou, M., Kesanopoulos, K., Matzourani, R., Sioumala, M., Tabaki, A., Kremastinou, J.·2005·Clinical Microbiology and Infection

Abstract

Rapid, accurate and inexpensive diagnosis of bacterial meningitis is critical for patient management. This study describes the development and evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay for the detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type b, which globally account for 90% of cases of bacterial meningitis. The single-tube assay, based on the ctrA, ply and bex targets, respectively, enabled detection of 5-10 pg DNA. When the assay was tested with clinical samples (n = 425), its sensitivity for the three targets was 93.9%, 92.3% and 88%, respectively, while the overall specificity and positive predictive value of the assay was 100%. The negative predictive value was 99.1-99.5%. The methodology permits rapid and accurate detection of the three main pathogens that cause bacterial meningitis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01109.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 30 · Cited by 106

Authors
Tzanakaki, G., Tsopanomichalou, M., Kesanopoulos, K., Matzourani, R., Sioumala, M., Tabaki, A., & Kremastinou, J.
Affiliations
National School of Public Health (GR)
Corresponding author
Tzanakaki, G.
Venue
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
386-390
ISSN
1198-743X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1554665084
Cited by
106
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Microbiology and Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Keywords
bacterial meningitis, Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, multiplex PCR, molecular diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Diagnosis, Differential, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA, Bacterial, Humans, Meningitis, Haemophilus, Meningitis, Meningococcal, Meningitis, Pneumococcal, Neisseria meningitidis, Pneumococcal Infections, Sensitivity and Specificity, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptolysins, Transcription Factors, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Meningitis, Bacterial, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Membrane Transport Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review