The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Six ecological factors that may limit African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus
Abstract
African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) always live at low population densities relative to sympatric large carnivores. This suggests that there are basic ecological reasons for the wild dog's endangered status. We examined the effects of intraspecific and interspecific competition, infectious diseases, foraging success, genetics and human activities on wild dogs. We present data from wild dogs in the Selous Game Reserve, and make comparisons with other populations to identify the limiting factors that are broadly important. The high density of wild dogs in Selous (40 adults/1000 km 2) is associated with weak competition from lions and spotted hyenas. Across ecosystems, population density is negatively related to the intensity of interference competition with larger carnivores. Predation by lions and hyenas accounted for 13% of known‐cause deaths in Selous and 33–50% in other populations. Intraspecific competition caused 69% of known‐cause deaths in Selous, through infanticide and fights between packs, although most of the victims were juveniles with low reproductive value. Infectious diseases had little apparent impact in Selous (4% of deaths) or Kruger National Park (5%), but did play a role in the extinction of a small population in Serengeti. Infectious diseases and competition will generally interact because competitors harbor and transmit the diseases that affect wild dogs. Human activities caused 12% of deaths in Selous, even though it is large (43 000 km 2) and does not border large human or livestock populations. Humans were the major agent of mortality in some populations. Foraging success varied little across ecosystems and was not apparently limiting. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genotypes revealed clinal variation between Selous and distant populations (rather than geographically isolated subspecies, as previously suggested). All wild dog populations have a genetically effective size (Ne) less than 500, so gene flow is necessary to maintain genetic diversity within populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation.
Ritchie, E. G., & Johnson, C. N. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01347.x · Cited by 1,375
Lourenço, R., Penteriani, V., Rabaça, J. E., & Korpimäki, E. (2014) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12054 · Cited by 86
Marshall-Pescini, S., & Kaminski, J. (2014) · The Social Dog · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407818-5.00001-2 · Cited by 55
Novaro, A. J., Funes, M. C., & Jiménez, J. E. (2004) · The Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515562.003.0015 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Creel, S., & Creel, N. M.
- Venue
- Animal Conservation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 1367-9430 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1795
- OpenAlex
- W2153329330
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Six ecological factors that may limit African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-1795.1998.tb00220.x
- The paper
- Creel, S., & Creel, N. M. (1998). Six ecological factors that may limit African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus. Animal Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.1998.tb00220.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.