The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of human–carnivore conflict on tiger (Panthera tigris) and prey populations in Lao PDR
Open accessAbstract
Unique to South‐east Asia, Lao People's Democratic Republic contains extensive habitat for tigers and their prey within a multiple‐use protected area system covering 13% of the country. Although human population density is the lowest in the region, the impact of human occurrence in protected areas on tiger Panthera tigris and prey populations was unknown. We examined the effects of human–carnivore conflict on tiger and prey abundance and distribution in the Nam Et‐Phou Louey National Protected Area on the Lao–Vietnam border. We conducted intensive camera‐trap sampling of large carnivores and prey at varying levels of human population and monitored carnivore depredation of livestock across the protected area. The relative abundance of large ungulates was low throughout whereas that of small prey was significantly higher where human density was lower. The estimated tiger density for the sample area ranged from 0.2 to 0.7 per 100 km 2. Tiger abundance was significantly lower where human population and disturbance were greater. Three factors, commercial poaching associated with livestock grazing followed by prey depletion and competition between large carnivores, are likely responsible for tiger abundance and distribution. Maintaining tigers in the country's protected areas will be dependent on the spatial separation of large carnivores and humans by modifying livestock husbandry practices and enforcing zoning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sunquist, M., & Sunquist, F. (2002) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226518237.001.0001 · Cited by 1,179
Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures
Karanth, K. U., & Nichols, J. D. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:eotdii]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,176
Cited by
Single-species conservation in a multiple-use landscape: current protection of the tiger range
Forrest, J. L., Bomhard, B., Budiman, A., Coad, L., Cox, N., Dinerstein, E., Hammer, D., Huang, C., Huy, K., Kraft, R., et al. (2011) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00428.x · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, A., Vongkhamheng, C., Hedemark, M., & Saithongdam, T.
- Venue
- Animal Conservation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-07-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 421-430
- ISSN
- 1367-9430 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1795
- OpenAlex
- W1987189815
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of human–carnivore conflict on tiger (Panthera tigris) and prey populations in Lao PDR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00049.x
- The paper
- Johnson, A., Vongkhamheng, C., Hedemark, M., & Saithongdam, T. (2006). Effects of human–carnivore conflict on tiger (Panthera tigris) and prey populations in Lao PDR. Animal Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00049.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.