The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE ESTIMATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LOGARITHM OF A RATIO OF FREQUENCIES
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models
Jaeger, T. F. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 · Cited by 3,317
“Several such transformations have been proposed, the most well-known being the empirical logit (first proposed by Haldane (1955), but often attributed to Cox (1970)).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance
Glas, A. S., Lijmer, J. G., Prins, M. H., Bonsel, G. J., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00177-x · Cited by 2,261
Deeks, J. J., Altman, D. G., & Bradburn, M. J. (2001) · Systematic Reviews in Health Care · doi:10.1002/9780470693926.ch15 · Cited by 2,163
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.
Lijmer, J. G. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1061 · Cited by 1,861
Drug Treatment of Hyperlipidemia in Women
Walsh, J. M. E. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.18.2243 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- HALDANE, B. J. B. S.
- Venue
- Annals of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1956-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 309-311
- ISSN
- 0003-4800 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1809
- OpenAlex
- W2135577623
- Cited by
- 1,076
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE ESTIMATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LOGARITHM OF A RATIO OF FREQUENCIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01285.x
- The paper
- HALDANE, B. J. B. S. (1956). THE ESTIMATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LOGARITHM OF A RATIO OF FREQUENCIES. Annals of Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01285.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
