Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The marker (X) syndrome: a cytogenetic and genetic analysis

Sherman, S. L., Morton, N. E., Jacobs, P. A., Turner, G.·1984·Annals of Human Genetics

Abstract

Summary: The results of a cytogenetic and segregation analysis of 110 pedigrees of the mar (X) syndrome are reported. The cytogenetic study indicated an inverse relationship between IQ and the mar(X) frequency in females but not in males. A small but significant effect of age on mar(X) frequency was observed in both males and females, but in females it was restricted to those of normal intelligence, retarded females showing no significant effect. Classical segregation analysis was performed using the program segran, analyzing sexes separately. a 20% deficit of affected males was observed, the most plausible explanation for the majority of these cases being incomplete penetrance. since this was an unexpected result, the data were scrutinized for possible biases; however, correction of these had little effect on the estimate. the penetrance of mental impairment in carrier females was estimated to be 30% and of mental impairment and/or mar(x) expression to be 56%. thus 44% of carriers cannot be detected with our definition of affection. no evidence for sporadic cases among affected males was found. complex segregation analysis was performed using the sex‐linked version of pointer analysing sexes together. this was done in order to test the results from classical segregation analysis, to test for family resemblance and to estimate mutation rates. it was confirmed that there was a 20% deficit of affected males, that, penetrance of mental impairment in females was approximately 30% and that there was no evidence: for sporadic: males. thus all males with the gene appear t o have received it from their carrier mothers and all mutations must occur in sperm. the mutation rate in sperm was estimated to be as high as 7·2 × 10‐4, implying that over one‐half of random carrier females are fresh mutants. our results have important implications for genetic counseling as they imply that all mothers of isolated affected males are carriers, that normal brothers of affected males have a 17% chance of carrying the gene and transmitting it to all their daughters, and that normal sisters of affected males have, at most, a 30% chance of being carriers. since there are biases in the data due to the testing of particular individuals, these probabilities must be considered approximations until they are independently confirmed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1984.tb00830.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Sherman, S. L., Morton, N. E., Jacobs, P. A., & Turner, G.
Venue
Annals of Human Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
21-37
ISSN
  • 0003-4800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1809
OpenAlex
W2055092110
Cited by
386
References
28
FWCI
26.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The marker (X) syndrome: a cytogenetic and genetic analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1984.tb00830.x
The paper
Sherman, S. L., Morton, N. E., Jacobs, P. A., & Turner, G. (1984). The marker (X) syndrome: a cytogenetic and genetic analysis. Annals of Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1984.tb00830.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.