Cited by 98Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesEchinoderm biology and ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

EVOLUTION AND ADAPTATION IN THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM OF THE METAZOA

YONGE, C. M.·1937·Biological Reviews

Abstract

Summary: Digestion in the primitive animals must have been intracellular, as it remains in the Protozoa and in the Porifera. It has persisted, to a greater or less extent, in a number of Metazoa. These may be divided into two groups: (1) those which are primitive in structure, e.g. Coelenterata, Ctenophora, most Turbellaria, and Limulus; and (2) those which are more highly evolved but have retained intracellular digestion in correlation with their mode of feeding, e.g. Brachiopoda, Rotifera, Tardigrada, Pyncogonida, Arachnida (other than Limulus) and the majority of Mollusca excluding the Cephalopoda. These animals either feed on finely divided food (collected by ciliary mechanisms or scraped by a radula) or on fluid or semi‐fluid food which is sucked in. In certain cases, notably the Lamellibranchia, but also in the Echinodermata, intracellular digestion is assisted or exclusively carried out by wandering phagocytic blood cells. Extracellular digestion, originally developed with the increased size of available food as an aid to intracellular digestion, has completely replaced the more primitive form of digestion in certain rhabdocoel Turbellaria (probably), Polyzoa, Annelida, Myriapoda, Crustacea, Insecta, Cephalopoda and Chordata. This mode of digestion results in the reduction of the ingestive region of the gut and enables digestion, and the removal of indigestible material, to be hastened. The resultant increase in the rate of metabolism has had profound effects on the evolution of the Metazoa. The appearance of extracellular digestion has been accompanied by changes in the structure and physiology of the gut. Distinct regions have been specialized for (1) the reception of food, (2) its conduction and storage, (3) digestion and internal triturition, (4) absorption, and (5) conduction and formation of faeces. There is a definite correlation between the food of any animal and the nature and relative strengths of its digestive enzymes. Certain animals have acquired specific enzymes which enable them to exploit additional sources of food, the most important of such enzymes being cellulase and chitinase. There is a periodicity of secretion in the digestive glands of many Metazoa, e.g. Gastropoda and Crustacea. In the Lamellibranchia and in style‐bearing Gastropoda, the style constitutes an ideal mechanism for the continuous liberation of small quantities of enzyme (amylase). The p H of the gut is controlled in various ways in different phyla. In ciliary‐feeding animals this may be of importance not only in securing the optimum conditions for the action of extracellular enzymes but also by its influence on the viscosity of the mucus with which the food is entangled. There is evidence that the time taken for passage of food through the gut at any normal temperature corresponds to the period which is optimal for enzymatic action at that particular temperature. The most successful groups of animals are (1) those which possess feeding and digestive mechanisms capable of utilizing, as a result of morphological and physiological adaptations, many types of food, e.g. Annelida, Crustacea, Insecta, Gastropoda and Vertebrata, and (2) those in which one type of food is collected and digested with great efficiency, e.g. Coelenterata, Turbellaria, Arachnida, and Cephalopoda (carnivorous); Brachiopoda, Lamellibranchia, and Tunicata (ciliary feeders); Trematoda and Cestoda (parasites). Of these, the first have been by far the more successful, owing to their capacity for exploiting new sources of food, in the invasion of new habitats.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1937.tb01223.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 185

  1. 10.1002/jez.1400440107 · DOI
  2. Arnold G., 1909, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 54, 207
  3. Autrum H., 1934, Z. vergl. Physiol., 21, 429, 10.1007/BF00339124 · DOI
  4. Bahl K. N., 1933, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 76, 107
  5. Beauchamp P., 1932, Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., 57, 428
  6. Běelehkádek J., 1922, Arch. int. Physiol., 17, 260
  7. Berrill N. J., 1929, Brit. J. exp. Biol., 6, 275, 10.1242/jeb.6.3.275 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/BF02952311 · DOI
  9. Beutler R., 1924, Z. vergl. Physiol., 1, 1, 10.1007/BF00338209 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF00354119 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF01752229 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/BF01796256 · DOI
  13. Bodansky M., 1924, Amer. J. Physiol., 67, 547, 10.1152/ajplegacy.1924.67.3.547 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/1536652 · DOI
  15. Boynton L. C., 1927, J. biol. Chem., 75, 613, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)84169-2 · DOI
  16. Brasil L., 1904, Arch. Zool. exp. gén. (4), 2, 91
  17. Calman W. T., 1929, J. Quekett micr. Cl., 16, 95
  18. 10.1515/bchm2.1901.33.1-2.9 · DOI
  19. Cori C. J., 1929, Handbuch der Zoologie Kükenthal & Krumbach, 11, 1
  20. Cori C. J., 1930, Tierwelt der Nord- und Ostsee, 4, 1
  21. Cornwall J. W., 1914, Indian J. med. Res., 2, 569
  22. Dore W. H., 1923, Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., 22, 383
  23. 10.1007/BF01754788 · DOI
  24. Eidmann H., 1924, Z. wiss. Zool., 122, 281
  25. Enriques P., 1903, Arch. zool., 1, I
  26. 10.1007/BF00587746 · DOI
  27. Falck R., 1930, Cellulose-Chem., 11, 89
  28. Fliessinger N., 1910, Rev. Tuberc. Paris, (2), 7, 177
  29. Frenzel J., 1884, Mitt. zool. Sta. Neapel, 5, 50
  30. Graetz E., 1929, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 46, 375
  31. Graetz E., 1935, Z. vergl. Physiol., 22, 273, 10.1007/BF00339084 · DOI
  32. 10.1017/S0080456800016550 · DOI
  33. 10.1098/rspb.1931.0022 · DOI
  34. 10.1017/S0080456800016707 · DOI
  35. Gruvel A., 1893, Arch. Zaol. exp. gén. (3), 1, 401
  36. Gutheil F., 1912, Z. wiss. Zool., 99, 444
  37. 10.1042/bj0150736 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1934.tb02320.x · DOI
  39. Hering M.(1926).Biologie der Schmetterlinge. Berlin. · DOI
  40. Heyde H. C.van der(1922).Academic Thesis Amsterdam.
  41. Heyde H. C., 1924, Arch. int. Physiol., 24, 41
  42. Hirsch G. C., 1914, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 35, 357
  43. 10.1007/BF00337684 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/BF00343742 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1931.tb01022.x · DOI
  46. 10.1007/BF00340739 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/BF00337896 · DOI
  48. Hobson R. P., 1931, J. exp. Biol., 8, 109, 10.1242/jeb.8.2.109 · DOI
  49. 10.1042/bj0251458 · DOI
  50. Hobson R. P., 1932, J. exp. Biol., 9, 359, 10.1242/jeb.9.4.359 · DOI
  51. Hörstadius S., 1933, Biol. Zbl., 53, 645
  52. 10.1085/jgp.10.2.345 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/BF02658699 · DOI
  54. Jordan H. J., 1904, Z. wiss. Zool., 78, 165
  55. 10.1007/BF01682554 · DOI
  56. Jordan H. J., 1910, Biol. Zbl., 30, 85
  57. Jordan H. J.(1912).Zool. Jb. Suppl. 15 (3) 49. · DOI
  58. Jordan H. J., 1918, Arch, néerl. Physiol., 2, 471
  59. Jordan H. J., 1927, Handb. norm. u. pathol. Physiol., 4, 167
  60. Jordan H. J., 1932, Handb. norm. u. pathol. Physiol., 18, 21
  61. Jordan H. J., 1921, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 38, 565
  62. Jordan H. J., 1927, Handb. norm. u. pathol. Physiol., 3, 24
  63. Jordan H. J., 1918, Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver., 16, 281
  64. 10.1002/hlca.192901201104 · DOI
  65. 10.1002/hlca.19290120167 · DOI
  66. 10.1002/hlca.19250080141 · DOI
  67. Keilin D., 1920, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 65, 33
  68. 10.1086/physzool.4.4.30151159 · DOI
  69. Koller G., 1930, Z. vergl. Physiol., 11, 437, 10.1007/BF00338217 · DOI
  70. Kratky E., 1931, Z. wiss. Zool., 139, 120
  71. 10.1007/BF00340515 · DOI
  72. 10.1007/BF00340896 · DOI
  73. Krüger P., 1929, S.B. preuss. Akad. Wiss., 26, 1
  74. 10.1007/BF02331364 · DOI
  75. Krüger P., 1934, Handb. Biochem. Menschen Tiere, 2, 415
  76. Krüger P., 1928, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 45, 463
  77. Künssberg K., 1911, Zool. Anz., 38, 263
  78. 10.1515/bchm2.1934.225.4.169 · DOI
  79. Lengerken H., 1924, Biol. Zbl., 44, 273
  80. 10.1038/1351039c0 · DOI
  81. Lloyd F. E., 1926, Papers. Michigan Acad. Sci. Arts Letters, 7, 395
  82. Löhner L., 1916, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 36, 1
  83. Lowartz C., 1919, Fermentforschung, 3, 241
  84. Lowe E., 1935, Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., 58, 561
  85. Mackintosh N. A., 1925, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 60, 317
  86. Mansour K., 1933, Proc. Kon. Akad. Wet. Amst., 36, 795
  87. Mansour K., 1934, J. exp. Biol., 11, 243, 10.1242/jeb.11.3.243 · DOI
  88. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1934.tb01252.x · DOI
  89. Mansour‐Bek J. J., 1932, Z. vergl. Physiol., 17, 153, 10.1007/BF00339118 · DOI
  90. 10.1007/BF00361442 · DOI
  91. Marcus E., 1935, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 54, 385
  92. Miller R. C., 1926, Science, 63, 1638, 10.1126/science.63.1638.524.a · DOI
  93. 10.1017/S0025315400050888 · DOI
  94. Moore H. B., 1931, Proc. malacal. Soc. Lond., 19, 281
  95. 10.1017/S0025315400051468 · DOI
  96. 10.1017/S0370164600019544 · DOI
  97. Murlin J. R., 1902, Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., 54, 284
  98. 10.1002/jmor.1050310105 · DOI
  99. Ni T., 1933, Chin. J. Physiol. Rep. Ser., 7, 71
  100. 10.1017/S0080456800016495 · DOI
  101. 10.1017/S0025315400051924 · DOI
  102. 10.1007/BF01722828 · DOI
  103. Oomen H. A. P. C., 1925, Proc. Kon. Akad. Wet. Amst., 29, 1000
  104. Oomen H. A. P. C., 1926, Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli, 7, 215
  105. 10.1017/S0025315400007803 · DOI
  106. 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1932.tb02369.x · DOI
  107. Parker G. H., 1905, Amer. J. Physiol., 13, 1, 10.1152/ajplegacy.1905.13.1.1 · DOI
  108. 10.1073/pnas.14.9.713 · DOI
  109. Patanè L., 1928, Arch. Sci. biol. Napoli, 11, 77
  110. Pavlovsky E. N., 1926, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 70, 221
  111. 10.1007/BF00340511 · DOI
  112. Petrievic P., 1915, Zool. Anz., 46, 186
  113. Potts F. A., 1923, Proc. Comb. phil. Soc., Biol. Sci., 1, I
  114. 10.1007/BF02981281 · DOI
  115. Ramme W.(1920).S.B. Ges. naturf. Fr. Berl.1920 130. · DOI
  116. Randow E., 1924, Z. wiss. Zool., 122, 534
  117. Rehorst G., 1914, Zool. Anz., 44, 228
  118. Reichenow E., 1918, Bol. Soc. esp. Hist. nat., 18, 258
  119. Remane A., 1929, Z. vergl. Physiol., 11, 146, 10.1007/BF00339074 · DOI
  120. 10.1007/BF00339818 · DOI
  121. 10.1007/BF00412993 · DOI
  122. Rosén B., 1932, Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, 14, 1
  123. 10.1007/BF00713484 · DOI
  124. 10.1002/jez.1400250203 · DOI
  125. Sawano E., 1928, Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. (4), 3, 205
  126. Sawano E., 1935, Sci. Rep. Tokyo Bunrika Daig. B, 2, 101
  127. Schlottke E., 1933, S.B. naturf. Ges. Rostock, 4, 76
  128. Schlottke E., 1933, Z. mikr.-anat. Forsch., 32, 633
  129. Schlottke E., 1933, Zool. Anz., 104, 109
  130. Schlottke E., 1934, Z. mikr.-anat. Forsch., 35, 57
  131. Schlottke E., 1934, Biol. Zbl., 54, 51
  132. Schlottke E., 1935, Z. vergl. Physiol., 22, 359, 10.1007/BF00339089 · DOI
  133. 10.1007/BF00424727 · DOI
  134. Schreiber B., 1930, Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli, 10, 235
  135. Schuurmans Stekhoven J. H., 1930, Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver. (3), 2, 60
  136. 10.1007/BF02119403 · DOI
  137. Semon R., 1889, Biol. Cbl., 9, 80
  138. Sereni E., 1929, Boll. Soc. Biol. sper., 4, 749
  139. Shinoda O., 1926, Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto B, 2, 93
  140. 10.1007/BF01094500 · DOI
  141. 10.1007/BF00339169 · DOI
  142. Shinoda O., 1930, J. Biochem. Tokyo, 11, 345, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a125051 · DOI
  143. Shinoda O., 1931, Annot. zool. jap., 13, 117
  144. 10.1007/BF01678176 · DOI
  145. Sigerfoos C. P., 1908, Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., 27, 191
  146. Smith H. G.(1936).Pap. Tortugas Lab. (in the press).
  147. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1926.tb04254.x · DOI
  148. Stephenson J.(1930).The Oligochaeta. Oxford.
  149. Steudel A., 1913, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 33, 165
  150. 10.1007/BF00710446 · DOI
  151. Swingle H. S., 1925, Ohio J. Sci., 25, 209
  152. Takatsuki S., 1934, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 76, 379
  153. Trigt H., 1919, Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver. (2), 17, 1
  154. 10.1007/BF00340888 · DOI
  155. Uvarov B. P.(1928).Trans. R. ent. Soc. Land.1928 p.255.
  156. Voigt O., 1933, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 52, 677
  157. 10.1007/BF00340917 · DOI
  158. 10.1152/physrev.1931.11.3.358 · DOI
  159. Weese A. O., 1926, Publ. Puget Sd Mar. (biol.) Sta., 5, 165
  160. Westblad E., 1923, Acta Univ. lund. N.F., 18
  161. Wiedemann J. F., 1930, Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 19, 228
  162. 10.1007/BF00339164 · DOI
  163. 10.1042/bj0210791 · DOI
  164. 10.1042/bj0210797 · DOI
  165. 10.1042/bj0220150 · DOI
  166. 10.1017/S0031182000022988 · DOI
  167. Wigglesworth V. B., 1932, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 75, 131
  168. 10.1002/jmor.1050400205 · DOI
  169. Yonge C. M., 1923, Brit. J. exp. Biol., 1, 15, 10.1242/jeb.1.1.15 · DOI
  170. Yonge C. M., 1924, Brit. J. exp. Biol., 1, 343, 10.1242/jeb.1.3.343 · DOI
  171. Yonge C. M., 1925, Brit. J. exp. Biol., 2, 373, 10.1242/jeb.2.3.373 · DOI
  172. 10.1017/S0025315400009358 · DOI
  173. 10.1017/S0080456800016124 · DOI
  174. 10.1017/S002531540000789X · DOI
  175. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1928.tb00882.x · DOI
  176. 10.1098/rstb.1928.0004 · DOI
  177. 10.1017/S0025315400009577 · DOI
  178. Yonge C. M., 1930, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1, 13
  179. Yonge C. M., 1930, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1, 59
  180. 10.1093/icesjms/6.2.175 · DOI
  181. Yonge C. M., 1931, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1, 83
  182. Yonge C. M., 1932, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1, 259
  183. 10.1017/S0025315400045252 · DOI
  184. Yonge C. M., 1936, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1, 283
  185. 10.1098/rspb.1936.0021 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 98

Metadata

Authors
YONGE, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
YONGE, C. M.
Venue
Biological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1937-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
87-114
ISSN
  • 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-7931
  • 1469-185X
OpenAlex
W2099860922
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Echinoderm biology and ecology
Keywords
intracellular digestion, extracellular digestion, digestive system evolution, digestive enzymes, cellulase, chitinase, digestive gland, feeding mode, animals, gastropod shells, gastropod shell morphology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EVOLUTION AND ADAPTATION IN THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM OF THE METAZOA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1937.tb01223.x
The paper
YONGE, C. M. (1937). EVOLUTION AND ADAPTATION IN THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM OF THE METAZOA. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1937.tb01223.x