The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EVOLUTION AND ADAPTATION IN THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM OF THE METAZOA
Abstract
Summary: Digestion in the primitive animals must have been intracellular, as it remains in the Protozoa and in the Porifera. It has persisted, to a greater or less extent, in a number of Metazoa. These may be divided into two groups: (1) those which are primitive in structure, e.g. Coelenterata, Ctenophora, most Turbellaria, and Limulus; and (2) those which are more highly evolved but have retained intracellular digestion in correlation with their mode of feeding, e.g. Brachiopoda, Rotifera, Tardigrada, Pyncogonida, Arachnida (other than Limulus) and the majority of Mollusca excluding the Cephalopoda. These animals either feed on finely divided food (collected by ciliary mechanisms or scraped by a radula) or on fluid or semi‐fluid food which is sucked in. In certain cases, notably the Lamellibranchia, but also in the Echinodermata, intracellular digestion is assisted or exclusively carried out by wandering phagocytic blood cells. Extracellular digestion, originally developed with the increased size of available food as an aid to intracellular digestion, has completely replaced the more primitive form of digestion in certain rhabdocoel Turbellaria (probably), Polyzoa, Annelida, Myriapoda, Crustacea, Insecta, Cephalopoda and Chordata. This mode of digestion results in the reduction of the ingestive region of the gut and enables digestion, and the removal of indigestible material, to be hastened. The resultant increase in the rate of metabolism has had profound effects on the evolution of the Metazoa. The appearance of extracellular digestion has been accompanied by changes in the structure and physiology of the gut. Distinct regions have been specialized for (1) the reception of food, (2) its conduction and storage, (3) digestion and internal triturition, (4) absorption, and (5) conduction and formation of faeces. There is a definite correlation between the food of any animal and the nature and relative strengths of its digestive enzymes. Certain animals have acquired specific enzymes which enable them to exploit additional sources of food, the most important of such enzymes being cellulase and chitinase. There is a periodicity of secretion in the digestive glands of many Metazoa, e.g. Gastropoda and Crustacea. In the Lamellibranchia and in style‐bearing Gastropoda, the style constitutes an ideal mechanism for the continuous liberation of small quantities of enzyme (amylase). The p H of the gut is controlled in various ways in different phyla. In ciliary‐feeding animals this may be of importance not only in securing the optimum conditions for the action of extracellular enzymes but also by its influence on the viscosity of the mucus with which the food is entangled. There is evidence that the time taken for passage of food through the gut at any normal temperature corresponds to the period which is optimal for enzymatic action at that particular temperature. The most successful groups of animals are (1) those which possess feeding and digestive mechanisms capable of utilizing, as a result of morphological and physiological adaptations, many types of food, e.g. Annelida, Crustacea, Insecta, Gastropoda and Vertebrata, and (2) those in which one type of food is collected and digested with great efficiency, e.g. Coelenterata, Turbellaria, Arachnida, and Cephalopoda (carnivorous); Brachiopoda, Lamellibranchia, and Tunicata (ciliary feeders); Trematoda and Cestoda (parasites). Of these, the first have been by far the more successful, owing to their capacity for exploiting new sources of food, in the invasion of new habitats.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Intracellular digestion is limited by lysosome availability. A higher rate of intracellular digestion is thus only made possible by a rise in cell numbers, which has led to an enlarged surface area of bilaterian gut regions with intracellular digestion. The spatial constraints of surface enlargement are overcome by extracellular digestion.”
From A non-bilaterian perspective on the development and evolution of animal digestive systems (2019) · cites this paper as Yonge 1937
In the citing paper
“The size of particles taken up by phagocytosis is limited by the size of the phagocytic cell. Extracellular digestion overcomes these limitations by breaking up larger pieces of food into smaller particles. Its evolution has thus allowed animals to feed on large organisms and has widely expanded available food resources.”
From A non-bilaterian perspective on the development and evolution of animal digestive systems (2019) · cites this paper as Yonge 1937
In the citing paper
“The constant generation of new, single-use lysosomal vesicles for intracellular digestion is energetically costly due to the ATP-dependent acidification of the lysosomal content, and the synthesis of new digestive enzymes.”
From A non-bilaterian perspective on the development and evolution of animal digestive systems (2019) · cites this paper as Yonge 1937
In the citing paper
“As extracellular digestive enzymes can digest much larger food particles, it is possible that their extracellular use is more efficient in comparison to intracellular digestion by lysosomal enzymes.”
From A non-bilaterian perspective on the development and evolution of animal digestive systems (2019) · cites this paper as Yonge 1937
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 185
- 10.1002/jez.1400440107 · DOI
- Arnold G., 1909, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 54, 207
- Autrum H., 1934, Z. vergl. Physiol., 21, 429, 10.1007/BF00339124 · DOI
- Bahl K. N., 1933, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 76, 107
- Beauchamp P., 1932, Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., 57, 428
- Běelehkádek J., 1922, Arch. int. Physiol., 17, 260
- Berrill N. J., 1929, Brit. J. exp. Biol., 6, 275, 10.1242/jeb.6.3.275 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02952311 · DOI
- Beutler R., 1924, Z. vergl. Physiol., 1, 1, 10.1007/BF00338209 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00354119 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01752229 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01796256 · DOI
- Bodansky M., 1924, Amer. J. Physiol., 67, 547, 10.1152/ajplegacy.1924.67.3.547 · DOI
- 10.2307/1536652 · DOI
- Boynton L. C., 1927, J. biol. Chem., 75, 613, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)84169-2 · DOI
- Brasil L., 1904, Arch. Zool. exp. gén. (4), 2, 91
- Calman W. T., 1929, J. Quekett micr. Cl., 16, 95
- 10.1515/bchm2.1901.33.1-2.9 · DOI
- Cori C. J., 1929, Handbuch der Zoologie Kükenthal & Krumbach, 11, 1
- Cori C. J., 1930, Tierwelt der Nord- und Ostsee, 4, 1
- Cornwall J. W., 1914, Indian J. med. Res., 2, 569
- Dore W. H., 1923, Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., 22, 383
- 10.1007/BF01754788 · DOI
- Eidmann H., 1924, Z. wiss. Zool., 122, 281
- Enriques P., 1903, Arch. zool., 1, I
- 10.1007/BF00587746 · DOI
- Falck R., 1930, Cellulose-Chem., 11, 89
- Fliessinger N., 1910, Rev. Tuberc. Paris, (2), 7, 177
- Frenzel J., 1884, Mitt. zool. Sta. Neapel, 5, 50
- Graetz E., 1929, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 46, 375
- Graetz E., 1935, Z. vergl. Physiol., 22, 273, 10.1007/BF00339084 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0080456800016550 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1931.0022 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0080456800016707 · DOI
- Gruvel A., 1893, Arch. Zaol. exp. gén. (3), 1, 401
- Gutheil F., 1912, Z. wiss. Zool., 99, 444
- 10.1042/bj0150736 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1934.tb02320.x · DOI
- Hering M.(1926).Biologie der Schmetterlinge. Berlin. · DOI
- Heyde H. C.van der(1922).Academic Thesis Amsterdam.
- Heyde H. C., 1924, Arch. int. Physiol., 24, 41
- Hirsch G. C., 1914, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 35, 357
- 10.1007/BF00337684 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00343742 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1931.tb01022.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00340739 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00337896 · DOI
- Hobson R. P., 1931, J. exp. Biol., 8, 109, 10.1242/jeb.8.2.109 · DOI
- 10.1042/bj0251458 · DOI
- Hobson R. P., 1932, J. exp. Biol., 9, 359, 10.1242/jeb.9.4.359 · DOI
- Hörstadius S., 1933, Biol. Zbl., 53, 645
- 10.1085/jgp.10.2.345 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02658699 · DOI
- Jordan H. J., 1904, Z. wiss. Zool., 78, 165
- 10.1007/BF01682554 · DOI
- Jordan H. J., 1910, Biol. Zbl., 30, 85
- Jordan H. J.(1912).Zool. Jb. Suppl. 15 (3) 49. · DOI
- Jordan H. J., 1918, Arch, néerl. Physiol., 2, 471
- Jordan H. J., 1927, Handb. norm. u. pathol. Physiol., 4, 167
- Jordan H. J., 1932, Handb. norm. u. pathol. Physiol., 18, 21
- Jordan H. J., 1921, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 38, 565
- Jordan H. J., 1927, Handb. norm. u. pathol. Physiol., 3, 24
- Jordan H. J., 1918, Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver., 16, 281
- 10.1002/hlca.192901201104 · DOI
- 10.1002/hlca.19290120167 · DOI
- 10.1002/hlca.19250080141 · DOI
- Keilin D., 1920, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 65, 33
- 10.1086/physzool.4.4.30151159 · DOI
- Koller G., 1930, Z. vergl. Physiol., 11, 437, 10.1007/BF00338217 · DOI
- Kratky E., 1931, Z. wiss. Zool., 139, 120
- 10.1007/BF00340515 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00340896 · DOI
- Krüger P., 1929, S.B. preuss. Akad. Wiss., 26, 1
- 10.1007/BF02331364 · DOI
- Krüger P., 1934, Handb. Biochem. Menschen Tiere, 2, 415
- Krüger P., 1928, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 45, 463
- Künssberg K., 1911, Zool. Anz., 38, 263
- 10.1515/bchm2.1934.225.4.169 · DOI
- Lengerken H., 1924, Biol. Zbl., 44, 273
- 10.1038/1351039c0 · DOI
- Lloyd F. E., 1926, Papers. Michigan Acad. Sci. Arts Letters, 7, 395
- Löhner L., 1916, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 36, 1
- Lowartz C., 1919, Fermentforschung, 3, 241
- Lowe E., 1935, Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., 58, 561
- Mackintosh N. A., 1925, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 60, 317
- Mansour K., 1933, Proc. Kon. Akad. Wet. Amst., 36, 795
- Mansour K., 1934, J. exp. Biol., 11, 243, 10.1242/jeb.11.3.243 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1934.tb01252.x · DOI
- Mansour‐Bek J. J., 1932, Z. vergl. Physiol., 17, 153, 10.1007/BF00339118 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00361442 · DOI
- Marcus E., 1935, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 54, 385
- Miller R. C., 1926, Science, 63, 1638, 10.1126/science.63.1638.524.a · DOI
- 10.1017/S0025315400050888 · DOI
- Moore H. B., 1931, Proc. malacal. Soc. Lond., 19, 281
- 10.1017/S0025315400051468 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0370164600019544 · DOI
- Murlin J. R., 1902, Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., 54, 284
- 10.1002/jmor.1050310105 · DOI
- Ni T., 1933, Chin. J. Physiol. Rep. Ser., 7, 71
- 10.1017/S0080456800016495 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0025315400051924 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01722828 · DOI
- Oomen H. A. P. C., 1925, Proc. Kon. Akad. Wet. Amst., 29, 1000
- Oomen H. A. P. C., 1926, Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli, 7, 215
- 10.1017/S0025315400007803 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1932.tb02369.x · DOI
- Parker G. H., 1905, Amer. J. Physiol., 13, 1, 10.1152/ajplegacy.1905.13.1.1 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.14.9.713 · DOI
- Patanè L., 1928, Arch. Sci. biol. Napoli, 11, 77
- Pavlovsky E. N., 1926, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 70, 221
- 10.1007/BF00340511 · DOI
- Petrievic P., 1915, Zool. Anz., 46, 186
- Potts F. A., 1923, Proc. Comb. phil. Soc., Biol. Sci., 1, I
- 10.1007/BF02981281 · DOI
- Ramme W.(1920).S.B. Ges. naturf. Fr. Berl.1920 130. · DOI
- Randow E., 1924, Z. wiss. Zool., 122, 534
- Rehorst G., 1914, Zool. Anz., 44, 228
- Reichenow E., 1918, Bol. Soc. esp. Hist. nat., 18, 258
- Remane A., 1929, Z. vergl. Physiol., 11, 146, 10.1007/BF00339074 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00339818 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00412993 · DOI
- Rosén B., 1932, Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, 14, 1
- 10.1007/BF00713484 · DOI
- 10.1002/jez.1400250203 · DOI
- Sawano E., 1928, Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. (4), 3, 205
- Sawano E., 1935, Sci. Rep. Tokyo Bunrika Daig. B, 2, 101
- Schlottke E., 1933, S.B. naturf. Ges. Rostock, 4, 76
- Schlottke E., 1933, Z. mikr.-anat. Forsch., 32, 633
- Schlottke E., 1933, Zool. Anz., 104, 109
- Schlottke E., 1934, Z. mikr.-anat. Forsch., 35, 57
- Schlottke E., 1934, Biol. Zbl., 54, 51
- Schlottke E., 1935, Z. vergl. Physiol., 22, 359, 10.1007/BF00339089 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00424727 · DOI
- Schreiber B., 1930, Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli, 10, 235
- Schuurmans Stekhoven J. H., 1930, Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver. (3), 2, 60
- 10.1007/BF02119403 · DOI
- Semon R., 1889, Biol. Cbl., 9, 80
- Sereni E., 1929, Boll. Soc. Biol. sper., 4, 749
- Shinoda O., 1926, Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto B, 2, 93
- 10.1007/BF01094500 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00339169 · DOI
- Shinoda O., 1930, J. Biochem. Tokyo, 11, 345, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a125051 · DOI
- Shinoda O., 1931, Annot. zool. jap., 13, 117
- 10.1007/BF01678176 · DOI
- Sigerfoos C. P., 1908, Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., 27, 191
- Smith H. G.(1936).Pap. Tortugas Lab. (in the press).
- 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1926.tb04254.x · DOI
- Stephenson J.(1930).The Oligochaeta. Oxford.
- Steudel A., 1913, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 33, 165
- 10.1007/BF00710446 · DOI
- Swingle H. S., 1925, Ohio J. Sci., 25, 209
- Takatsuki S., 1934, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 76, 379
- Trigt H., 1919, Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver. (2), 17, 1
- 10.1007/BF00340888 · DOI
- Uvarov B. P.(1928).Trans. R. ent. Soc. Land.1928 p.255.
- Voigt O., 1933, Zool. Jb. Abt. Physiol., 52, 677
- 10.1007/BF00340917 · DOI
- 10.1152/physrev.1931.11.3.358 · DOI
- Weese A. O., 1926, Publ. Puget Sd Mar. (biol.) Sta., 5, 165
- Westblad E., 1923, Acta Univ. lund. N.F., 18
- Wiedemann J. F., 1930, Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 19, 228
- 10.1007/BF00339164 · DOI
- 10.1042/bj0210791 · DOI
- 10.1042/bj0210797 · DOI
- 10.1042/bj0220150 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0031182000022988 · DOI
- Wigglesworth V. B., 1932, Quart. J. micr. Sci., 75, 131
- 10.1002/jmor.1050400205 · DOI
- Yonge C. M., 1923, Brit. J. exp. Biol., 1, 15, 10.1242/jeb.1.1.15 · DOI
- Yonge C. M., 1924, Brit. J. exp. Biol., 1, 343, 10.1242/jeb.1.3.343 · DOI
- Yonge C. M., 1925, Brit. J. exp. Biol., 2, 373, 10.1242/jeb.2.3.373 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0025315400009358 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0080456800016124 · DOI
- 10.1017/S002531540000789X · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1928.tb00882.x · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1928.0004 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0025315400009577 · DOI
- Yonge C. M., 1930, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1, 13
- Yonge C. M., 1930, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1, 59
- 10.1093/icesjms/6.2.175 · DOI
- Yonge C. M., 1931, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1, 83
- Yonge C. M., 1932, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1, 259
- 10.1017/S0025315400045252 · DOI
- Yonge C. M., 1936, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1, 283
- 10.1098/rspb.1936.0021 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A non-bilaterian perspective on the development and evolution of animal digestive systems
Steinmetz, P. R. H. (2019) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-019-03075-x · Cited by 67
“…Kristensen and Higgins 1991; Storch 1991; Storch et al. 1989), Rotifera (Wurdak 1987; Yonge 1937), Micrognathozoa (Møbjerg Kristensen and Funch 2000; Yonge 1937), Gnathostomulida (Lammert 1991),Platyhelminthes (Antoniazzi and Silveira 1996; Bowen et al. 1974; Jennings 1968; Ruppert et al. 2004),…”
BackgroundInfluentialGetting to the bottom of anal evolution
Hejnol, A., & Martín-Durán, J. M. (2015) · Zoologischer Anzeiger - A Journal of Comparative Zoology · doi:10.1016/j.jcz.2015.02.006 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- YONGE, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- YONGE, C. M.
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1937-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-114
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2099860922
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Echinoderm biology and ecology
- Keywords
- intracellular digestion, extracellular digestion, digestive system evolution, digestive enzymes, cellulase, chitinase, digestive gland, feeding mode, animals, gastropod shells, gastropod shell morphology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EVOLUTION AND ADAPTATION IN THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM OF THE METAZOA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1937.tb01223.x
- The paper
- YONGE, C. M. (1937). EVOLUTION AND ADAPTATION IN THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM OF THE METAZOA. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1937.tb01223.x