The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An ecosystem‐level perspective of allelopathy
Abstract
Allelopathy is an interference mechanism by which plants release chemicals which affect other plants; while it has often been proposed as a mechanism for influencing plant populations and communities, its acceptance by plant ecologists has been limited because of methodological problems as well as difficulties of relating the results of bioassays used for testing allelopathy to vegetation patterns in the field. Here we argue that the concept of allelopathy is more appropriately applied at the ecosystem‐level, rather than the traditional population/community level of resolution. Firstly, we consider the wide ranging effects of secondary metabolites (widely regarded as allelochemicals) on organisms and processes which regulate ecosystem function, including herbivory, decomposition and nutrient mineralization. It is apparent that plants with allelopathic potential against other organisms induce net changes in ecosystem properties, which may in turn impact upon the plant community in the longer term. We then illustrate these concepts using two contrasting examples of how invasive plant species with allelopathic potential may alter ecosystem properties through the production of secondary metabolites, i.e.Carduus nutans(nodding thistle) in New Zealand pastures and Empetrum hermaphroditum(crowberry) in Swedish boreal forests. In both cases the production of secondary metabolites by the invasive species induces important effects on other organisms and key processes, which help determine how the ecosystem functions and ultimately the structure of the plant community. These examples help demonstrate that the concept of allelopathy is most effectively applied at the ecosystem‐level of resolution, rather than at the population‐level (i.e. plant‐plant interference).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trenbath, B., & Harper, J. L. (1978) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2402622 · Cited by 6,942
Organisms as Ecosystem Engineers
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., & Shachak, M. (1994) · Ecosystem Management · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4018-1_14 · Cited by 4,295
Resource Availability and Plant Antiherbivore Defense
Coley, P. D., Bryant, J. P., & Chapin, F. S. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.230.4728.895 · Cited by 3,967
Community structure, population control, and competition.
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E., & Slobodkin, L. B. (1960) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282146 · Cited by 3,492
Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems.
Tilman, D., Wedin, D., & Knops, J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379718a0 · Cited by 2,803
Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics
Melillo, J. M., Aber, J. D., & Muratore, J. F. (1982) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936780 · Cited by 2,641
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Weaver, T., & Grime, J. P. (1980) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3898436 · Cited by 2,548
Carbon/Nutrient Balance of Boreal Plants in Relation to Vertebrate Herbivory
Bryant, J. P., Chapin, F. S., & Klein, D. R. (1983) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544308 · Cited by 2,497
Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems
Naeem, S., Thompson, L. J., Lawler, S. P., Lawton, J. H., & Woodfin, R. M. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/368734a0 · Cited by 1,786
Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity
Huston, M. A. (1997) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050180 · Cited by 1,772
Cited by
THE ROLE OF ROOT EXUDATES IN RHIZOSPHERE INTERACTIONS WITH PLANTS AND OTHER ORGANISMS
Bais, H. P., Weir, T. L., Perry, L. G., Gilroy, S., & Vivanco, J. M. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159 · Cited by 4,682
Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability
Callaway, R. M., & Ridenour, W. M. (2004) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0436:nwisat]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,632
How plants communicate using the underground information superhighway
Bais, H. P., Park, S.-W., Weir, T. L., Callaway, R. M., & Vivanco, J. M. (2004) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2003.11.008 · Cited by 889
Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest
Nilsson, M.-C., & Wardle, D. A. (2005) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0421:uvaafe]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 835
Self-citationBiochemical and physiological mechanisms mediated by allelochemicals
Weir, T. L., Park, S.-W., & Vivanco, J. M. (2004) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2004.05.007 · Cited by 773
Metadata
- Authors
- WARDLE, D. A., NILSSON, M., GALLET, C., & ZACKRISSON, O.
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 305-319
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W1984747117
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An ecosystem‐level perspective of allelopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1998.tb00033.x
- The paper
- WARDLE, D. A., NILSSON, M., GALLET, C., & ZACKRISSON, O. (1998). An ecosystem‐level perspective of allelopathy. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1998.tb00033.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.