Acoustic communication in crocodilians: from behaviour to brain
Abstract
Crocodilians and birds are the modern representatives of Phylum Archosauria. Although there have been recent advances in our understanding of the phylogeny and ecology of ancient archosaurs like dinosaurs, it still remains a challenge to obtain reliable information about their behaviour. The comparative study of birds and crocodiles represents one approach to this interesting problem. One of their shared behavioural features is the use of acoustic communication, especially in the context of parental care. Although considerable data are available for birds, information concerning crocodilians is limited. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge about acoustic communication in crocodilians, from sound production to hearing processes, and to stimulate research in this field. Juvenile crocodilians utter a variety of communication sounds that can be classified into various functional categories: (1) "hatching calls", solicit the parents at hatching and fine-tune hatching synchrony among siblings; (2) "contact calls", thought to maintain cohesion among juveniles; (3) "distress calls", induce parental protection; and (4) "threat and disturbance calls", which perhaps function in defence. Adult calls can likewise be classified as follows: (1) "bellows", emitted by both sexes and believed to function during courtship and territorial defence; (2) "maternal growls", might maintain cohesion among offspring; and (3) "hisses", may function in defence. However, further experi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Percussion is a means of acoustic signalling involving sounds created by body-body or body‐object striking, such as jaw pops and headslaps.
“A third means of acoustic signalling is percussion, involving sounds created by body–body or body‐object striking, such as jaw pops and headslaps (Vergne et al. 2009; Riede et al. 2011, 2015).”
From Roars, Rumbles, and Resonance: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Crocodylian Acoustic Signals (2026) · cites this paper as Vergne et al. 2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 150 · Cited by 151
- Authors
- Vergne, A. L., Pritz, M. B., & Mathevon, N.
- Affiliations
- Université Jean Monnet (FR)
- Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vergne, A. L.
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07-23
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-411
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2077763219
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 150
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Keywords
- crocodilians, acoustic communication, vocalizations, parental care, contact calls, distress calls, bellows, hiss, sound production, hearing, auditory pathway, telencephalon, archosaurs, comparative behavior
- MeSH terms
- Alligators and Crocodiles, Animals, Brain, Hearing, Vocalization, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review