The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complexity Theory and the Philosophy of Education
Abstract
Following a brief introduction to complexity theory, this paper considers how various themes in the field relate to the philosophical study of education. Issues and questions introduced include the challenge of complexity theory for the philosophy of education—and, conversely, some critical challenges for complexity theory from educational philosophy; complexity theory and educational continuity and change; the importance that complexity theory places on interpretive perspectives that are transphenomenal, transdisciplinary and transdiscursive; the risks of simplifying complexity to a point that excludes its ambiguities and includes only its dominant usages; the degree of coherence between Dewey's philosophical orientation and that of complexity theory; how Foucault might be read as a complexity theorist; how educational research informed by complexity theory might ask different questions with different analytical perspectives—connectionist, holistic, non‐linear, rather than input–output ‘black‐box’ causal modelling, for example; and how curriculum, teaching, the epistemology of schooling, and the ‘education of consciousness’—understood as an emergent phenomenon—might be different when viewed from the perspective of complexity theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2017) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262529365.001.0001 · Cited by 2,449
Cited by
Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311413609 · Cited by 1,814
Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study
Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20029 · Cited by 458
Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348 · Cited by 337
Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour, A. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Mason, M.
- Venue
- Educational Philosophy and Theory
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-18
- ISSN
- 0013-1857 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5812
- OpenAlex
- W2023932522
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complexity Theory and the Philosophy of Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00412.x
- The paper
- Mason, M. (2008). Complexity Theory and the Philosophy of Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00412.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.