Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methylphenidate improves working memory and set‐shifting in AD/HD: relationships to baseline memory capacity

Mehta, Mitul A., Goodyer, Ian M., Sahakian, Barbara J.·2004·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Catecholamine stimulant drugs are highly efficacious treatments for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders (AD/HD). Catecholamine modulation in humans influences performance of numerous cognitive tasks, including tests of attention and working memory (WM). Clear delineation of the effects of methylphenidate upon such cognitive functions in AD/HD would enhance understanding of the effects of drug treatment. Method: Here we present a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of the cognitive effects of an acute dose of methylphenidate ( c . .5 mg/kg) in 14 boys aged 10.86 (±1.19) years meeting criteria for DSM‐IV AD/HD. Current behaviour was ascertained using Conners’ teacher and parent self‐report questionnaires and IQ was tested using sub‐tests from WISC‐III‐UK. Tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) were selected to assess visuo‐spatial recognition memory, spatial WM, planning, visual‐search and attentional‐set shifting. Results: Methylphenidate improved spatial WM, attentional‐set shifting and visual‐search task performance. Correlational analyses suggested possible relationships between WM capacity and spatial WM performance improvement. Also, poor performance on the attentional‐set shifting task on placebo was associated with increased errors on the spatial WM task on placebo. Conclusions: Methylphenidate may selectively improve both underlying cognitive difficulties in tasks dependent on intact fronto‐striatal structures, and clinical symptoms of AD/HD. Pre‐treatment measures may have some predictive value in determining individual differences in drug response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00221.x

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Charney D.S., 1986, Abnormal regulation of adrenergic function in panic disorder, American Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 1042
  2. Conners C.K., 1997, Conner's Rating Scale – revised. Technical manual
  3. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1986.tb02330.x · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1986.tb02330.x · Paper page
  4. Mehta M.A., 2001, Stimulant drugs and AD/HD: Basic and clinical neuroscience, 303
  5. Milner B., 1964, The frontal granular cortex and behaviour
  6. 10.1037/0022-006X.65.1.150 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Weschler D., 1992, Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children – third edition UK

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Mehta, M. A., Goodyer, I. M., & Sahakian, B. J.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01-22
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
293-305
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1995785377
Cited by
259
References
71
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methylphenidate improves working memory and set‐shifting in AD/HD: relationships to baseline memory capacity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00221.x
The paper
Mehta, M. A., Goodyer, I. M., & Sahakian, B. J. (2004). Methylphenidate improves working memory and set‐shifting in AD/HD: relationships to baseline memory capacity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00221.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.