Cited by 81Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyMental Health Research Topics

Gene–environment interplay in internalizing disorders: consistent findings across six environmental risk factors

Open access
Hicks, Brian M., DiRago, Ana C., Iacono, William G., McGue, Matt·2009·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Behavior genetic methods can help to elucidate gene‐environment (G‐E) interplay in the development of internalizing (INT) disorders (i.e., major depression and anxiety disorders). To date, however, no study has conducted a comprehensive analysis examining multiple environmental risk factors with the purpose of delineating general mechanisms of G‐E influence in the development of INT disorders. Methods: The sample consisted of 1315 male and female twin pairs participating in the age 17 assessment of the Minnesota Twin Family Study. Quantitative G‐E interplay models were used to examine how genetic and environmental risk for INT disorders changes as a function of environmental context. Multiple measures and informants were employed to construct composite measures of INT disorders and six environmental risk factors including: stressful life events, mother–child and father–child relationship problems, antisocial and prosocial peer affiliation, and academic achievement and engagement. Results: Significant moderation effects were detected between each environmental risk factor and INT such that in the context of greater environmental adversity, nonshared environmental factors became more important in the etiology of INT symptoms. Conclusion: Our results are consistent with the interpretation that environmental stressors have a causative effect on the emergence of INT disorders. The consistency of our results suggests a general mechanism of environmental influence on INT disorders regardless of the specific form of environmental risk

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02100.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 81

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 1987 3rd Edition Washington, D.C American Psychiatric Press Revised
  2. Gerard JM Buehler C Cumulative environmental risk and youth problem behavior Journal of Marriage and Family 2004 66 702 720
  3. Kendler KS Kessler RC Walters EE MacLean CJ Neale MC Heath AC Eaves LJ Stressful life events, genetic liability and onset of an episode of major depression in women: Evidence of genetic control of sensitivity to the environment American Journal of Psychiatry 1995 152 833 842 7755111
  4. Little RJ Rubin DB Statistical analysis with missing data 2002 Second edition New York John Wiley & Sons
  5. Neale MC Boker SM Xie G Maes HH Mx: Statistical Modeling 2003 6th Edition VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298 Department of Psychiatry
  6. Spitzer RL Williams JBW Gibbon M First MB Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, Patient Edition/Non-patient Edition (SCID-P/SCID-NP) 1990 Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press, Inc

Authors
Hicks, B. M., DiRago, A. C., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Hicks, Brian M.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-17
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
1309-1317
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2156407660
Cited by
81
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01da024417-02)
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA009367, R37AA009367, AA-09367)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01-DA024417, DA 024417, DA-05147, R01DA024417, R01DA005147, R37DA005147)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
gene-environment interaction, internalizing disorders, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, environmental risk factors, life events, peer affiliation, antisocial peers, academic performance, academic engagement, nonshared environment, Minnesota Twin Family Study, twin pairs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Environment, Female, Genetics, Behavioral, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review