The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feeling, caring, knowing: different types of empathy deficit in boys with psychopathic tendencies and autism spectrum disorder
Open accessAbstract
Background: Empathy dysfunction is one of the hallmarks of psychopathy, but it is also sometimes thought to characterise autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Individuals with either condition can appear uncaring towards others. This study set out to compare and contrast directly boys with psychopathic tendencies and boys with ASD on tasks assessing aspects of affective empathy and cognitive perspective taking. The main aim of the study was to assess whether a distinct profile of empathy deficits would emerge for boys with psychopathic tendencies and ASD, and whether empathy deficits would be associated with conduct problems in general, rather than psychopathic tendencies or ASD specifically. Methods: Four groups of boys aged between 9 and 16 years ( N = 96) were compared: 1) psychopathic tendencies, 2) ASD, 3) conduct problems and 4) comparison. Tasks were included to probe attribution of emotions to self, empathy for victims of aggression and cognitive perspective‐taking ability. Results: Boys with psychopathic tendencies had a profile consistent with dysfunctional affective empathy. They reported experiencing less fear and less empathy for victims of aggression than comparison boys. Their cognitive perspective‐taking abilities were not statistically significantly different from those of comparison boys. In contrast, boys with ASD had difficulties with tasks requiring cognitive perspective taking, but reported emotional experiences and victim empathy that were in line with comparison boys. Boys with conduct problems did not differ from comparison boys, suggesting that the affective empathy deficit seen in boys with psychopathic tendencies was specific to that group, rather than common to all boys with conduct problems. Conclusions: Although both groups can appear uncaring, our findings suggest that the affective/information processing correlates of psychopathic tendencies and ASD are quite different. Psychopathic tendencies are associated with difficulties in resonating with other people’s distress, whereas ASD is characterised by difficulties in knowing what other people think.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Social Work · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,519
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00 · Cited by 4,093
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Raber, G., & Spokas, M. (2025) · The Sage Encyclopedia of Mood and Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.4135/9781071886229.n145 · Cited by 2,764
Misunderstanding analysis of covariance.
Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.110.1.40 · Cited by 2,136 · cited 1×
“As recommended in the literature (e.g., Miller & Chapman, 2001; Knight & Silverstein, 2001), we do not report covariate analyses, as such analyses are considered problematic to interpret.”
BackgroundThe empathic brain: how, when and why?
de Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008 · Cited by 1,691
Castelli, F. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf189 · Cited by 1,377
Hollerbach, P., Mokros, A., Nitschke, J., & Habermeyer, E. (2018) · Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie · doi:10.1007/s11757-018-0478-z · Cited by 1,201
Callous-unemotional traits in a community sample of adolescents
Essau, C. A., Sasagawa, S., & Frick, P. J. (2006) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191106287354 · Cited by 875
Frith, U., & Mira, M. (1992) · Focus on Autistic Behavior · doi:10.1177/108835769200700302 · Cited by 870
Cited by
The Neurodiversity Approach(es): What Are They and What Do They Mean for Researchers?
Dwyer, P. (2022) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000523723 · Cited by 672
The neurobiology of psychopathic traits in youths
Blair, R. J. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3577 · Cited by 614
Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12152 · Cited by 535
Clinical assessment of social cognitive function in neurological disorders
Henry, J. D., von Hippel, W., Molenberghs, P., Lee, T., & Sachdev, P. S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.229 · Cited by 488
Bird, G., & Viding, E. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.021 · Cited by 472
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, A. P., Happé, F. G. E., Gilbert, F., Burnett, S., & Viding, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-13
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1188-1197
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- OpenAlex
- W1849713397
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 25.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feeling, caring, knowing: different types of empathy deficit in boys with psychopathic tendencies and autism spectrum disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02280.x
- The paper
- Jones, A. P., Happé, F. G. E., Gilbert, F., Burnett, S., & Viding, E. (2010). Feeling, caring, knowing: different types of empathy deficit in boys with psychopathic tendencies and autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02280.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.