Cited by 85

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The relationship between plasma progesterone and the timing of ovulation and early embryonic development in the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus)

Harlow, C. R., Gems, Sara, Hodges, J. K., Hearn, J. P.·1983·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Levels of progesterone in peripheral plasma samples showed a mean (± S.E.M.) ovarian cycle length of 28 ·63 ± 1·01 days (n= 19). The preovulatory, or follicular phase (mean ± S.E.M. length: 8·25 ± 0·30 days, n= 56) was defined as that period of the cycle during which progesterone levels remained below 10 ng/ml. The postovulatory, or luteal phase (mean ± S.E.M. length: 19·22 ± 0·63 days, n= 48) was defined as the remaining period of the cycle during which levels remained between 10 ng/ml and 150 ng/ml. The day of ovulation (day 0) was defined as that preceding the day on which progesterone levels first exceeded 10 ng/ml (day l), at the onset of the luteal phase. Oocytes and preim‐plantation embryos recovered from the reproductive tract provided supporting evidence for the timing of ovulation. The short follicular phase indicated that follicular growth may be initiated during the previous luteal phase. The long luteal phase may be related to the extended period of preim‐plantation development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1983.tb04276.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1530/jrf.0.0450611 · DOI
  2. 10.1530/jrf.0.0560271 · DOI
  3. 10.1530/jrf.0.0600101 · DOI
  4. 10.1530/jrf.0.0620467 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Butler H., 1974, Evolutionary trends in primate sex cycles, Contrib. Primatol., 3, 2
  6. 10.2307/1377422 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/ar.1090610402 · DOI
  8. 10.1159/000460023 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hawkey C. M., 1975, Comparative mammalian haematology
  10. 10.1258/002367777780936459 · DOI
  11. Hearn J. P., 1980, Endocrinology and timing of implantation in the marmoset monkey, Callithrix jacchus. Prog. reprod. Biol., 7, 262
  12. Hearn J. P., 1983, Reproduction in New World primates: 181–215
  13. Hearn J. P., 1975, The reproductive biology of the marmoset monkey, Callithrix jacchus, Lab. Anim. Handbk, 6, 191
  14. Hendrickx A. G., 1980, Non–human primate models for study of human reproduction: 109–115
  15. 10.1677/joe.0.0960443 · DOI
  16. 10.1530/jrf.0.0610083 · DOI
  17. 10.1159/000155291 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0031-9384(83)90171-3 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1093/biolreprod/8.2.246 · DOI
  20. 10.1095/biolreprod21.4.979 · DOI
  21. 10.1210/endo-81-5-1161 · DOI
  22. O'Rahilly R., 1973, Developmental stages in human embryos. part A: Embryos of the first three weeks
  23. Ortiz M. E., 1979, Recent advances in reproduction and fertility: 307–318
  24. 10.1210/endo-92-4-1096 · DOI
  25. Ross G. T., 1979, Maternal recognition of pregnancy: 191–208
  26. Ross G. T., 1970, Pituitary and gonadal hormones in women during spontaneous and induced ovulatory cycles, Recent Prog. Horm. Res., 26, 1
  27. 10.1007/BF02381326 · DOI
  28. 10.1677/joe.0.0790001 · DOI
  29. 10.1071/BI9691065 · DOI
  30. 10.1095/biolreprod17.2.228 · DOI
  31. 10.1210/edrv-2-1-27 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harlow, C. R., Gems, S., Hodges, J. K., & Hearn, J. P.
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-10
Volume
201
Issue
2
Pages
273-282
ISSN
  • 0952-8369
  • 1469-7998
Cited by
85
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review