The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Linear relations in biomechanics: the statistics of scaling functions
Abstract
The problem of fitting a linear relation to a bivariate data cluster obtained from morphometric measurement or from experiment is formulated rigorously, and a family of solutions (the general structural relation, g.s.r.) is derived. The regression, reduced major axis and major axis models are special cases of this model; it permits a more realistic treatment of the errors in the variates, in particular when the errors are correlated, which is particularly important in the many biological situations in which the variates contain uncontrolled real variation in addition to measurement errors. The analysis is particularly directed to the testing of hypotheses about scaling relations derived from biomechanical theory. By making different assumptions about the configuration of the errors, the g.s.r. can also be used to test for transposition allometry and for the significance of an estimated or hypothesized gradient. The model generalizes simply to multivariate problems. Application is demonstrated with examples drawn from the study of bird flight mechanics. Finally, it is demonstrated that since observed quantities correspond to peaks of adaptation or of selective fitness, scaling relations are determined primarily by scale variation of constraints on adaptation and behaviour, and are the result of a variety of interacting factors rather than a response to a single selective force described by one simple hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-j · Cited by 2,542
Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00032325 · Cited by 2,365
Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts
Garland, T., Harvey, P. H., & Ives, A. R. (1992) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/41.1.18 · Cited by 2,151
MASS/LENGTH RESIDUALS: MEASURES OF BODY CONDITION OR GENERATORS OF SPURIOUS RESULTS?
Green, A. J. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1473:mlrmob]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 895
Vector field statistical analysis of kinematic and force trajectories
Pataky, T. C., Robinson, M. A., & Vanrenterghem, J. (2013) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.07.031 · Cited by 741
Metadata
- Authors
- RAYNER, J. M. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-07
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 415-439
- ISSN
- 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7998
- OpenAlex
- W2092356399
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linear relations in biomechanics: the statistics of scaling functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb05668.x
- The paper
- RAYNER, J. M. V. (1985). Linear relations in biomechanics: the statistics of scaling functions. Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb05668.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.