Cited by 30Ichthyology and Marine BiologyMarine animal studies overviewAvian ecology and behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Injuries to jackass penguins (Spheniscus demersus): evidence for shark involvement

Abstract

An analysis is presented of records of injuries and the types of injuries to jackass penguins in Algoa Bay, South Africa, over a 10‐year‐period. Sharks are implicated in causing most of the injuries, but other possible agents are discussed. The types of injuries were categorized and compared to the dentition of sharks known to occur in the area. Using a life‐size model of a jackass penguin and preserved jaws of sharks, bites were simulated to establish the types of injury inflicted by different species. Certain injuries indicate attack by great white sharks, while others cannot be ascribed to any particular species. Most shark injuries show single jaw involvement, and range from small cuts across the feathers to the bird being cut in two. Sharks accounted for the highest number of identifiable natural causes of death, but the significance of shark attack as a mortality factor in jackass penguins is difficult to assess.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1988.tb03761.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Ainley D. G., 1985, Dynamics of white shark/pinniped interactions in the Gulf of the Farallones, Mem. sth Calif. Acad. Sci., 9, 109
  2. Ames J. A., 1980, Evidence of white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, attacks on sea otters, Enhydra lutris. Calif. Fish Game, 66, 196
  3. Boersma P. D., 1976, An ecological and behavioural study of the Galapagos penguin, Living Bird, 15, 43
  4. Compagno L. J. V., 1984, FAO species catalogue. 4. Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date, FAO Fish. Synop., 4, 251
  5. Cooper J., 1974, The predators of the jackass penguin, Bull. Br. Orn. Club, 94, 21
  6. McCosker J. E., 1985, White shark attack behaviour: observations of and speculations about predator and prey strategies, Mem. sth Calif. Acad. Sci., 9, 123
  7. Müller‐Schwarze D., 1984, The behavior of penguins adapted to ice and tropics
  8. Randall R. M.(1983).Biology of the jackass penguinSpheniscus demersus (L.) at St. Croix Island South Africa. Unpubl.PhD thesis University of Port Elizabeth.
  9. 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1965.tb07279.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Randall, B. M., Randall, R. M., & Compagno, L. J. V.
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-04
Volume
214
Issue
4
Pages
589-599
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W1987788751
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
jackass penguin, Spheniscus demersus, shark attacks, Carcharodon carcharias, shark dentition, natural mortality, Algoa Bay, predator-prey interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review