The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina
Open accessAbstract
Camera‐trap surveys were carried out at two different sites within the Atlantic Forest of Misiones province, Argentina, to study the density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots. At Urugua‐í Provincial Park, 17 different individuals were captured (nine females, six males, two of unknown sex) during a 3‐month‐long survey (34 camera stations, 1409 trap days). At Iguazú National Park, 34 different individuals were trapped (20 adult females, nine adult males, two subadult females and three of unknown sex) during the survey (39 sampling stations, 1631 trap days). Population density estimates (±se) for Urugua‐í, in an area of between 150 and 259 km 2 (depending on the buffer used to estimate the area effectively sampled), range from 7.7±1.4 to 13.4±2.6 individuals × 100 km−2, whereas at Iguazú, in an area of between 275 and 428 km 2, a population density of between 12.8±2.7 and 20.0±4.2 individuals × 100 km−2 was estimated. Minimum observed range estimates for individuals with >3 capture sites range from 3.19 to 37.09 km 2 for four males and from 4.17 to 7.11 km 2 for three females, but underestimate the true home range size. Ocelots were captured more frequently along old roads than on new trails opened with machetes. Ocelots were captured more frequently at night than during the day and reduce their use of roads and trails during the week previous to and during full moon nights, a behavior previously reported for Amazonian ocelots. Population density estimates for ocelots in the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest ecoregion are lower than those at other neotropical sites. The whole Green Corridor contains a population of about 1280 individuals. This estimate should bring our attention to the larger cats (pumas and jaguars) that live at lower population densities because the future of their local populations is compromised if protected areas are not urgently created and properly managed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Circular Statistics in Biology
Watson, G. S., & Batschelet, E. (1982) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267831 · Cited by 4,587
Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations
Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., & Anderson, D. R. (1978) · Wildlife Monographs · Cited by 2,442
Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2735 · Cited by 1,445
Sunquist, M., & Sunquist, F. (2002) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226518237.001.0001 · Cited by 1,179
Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures
Karanth, K. U., & Nichols, J. D. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:eotdii]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,176 · cited 8×
“Model Mh assumes heterogeneity among individuals in their capture probabilities, and is the most logically correct because of the expected behavioral differences among individuals and their unequal access to camera traps (see Karanth & Nichols, 1998, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCapture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations.
Jolly, G. M., White, G. C., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., & Otis, D. L. (1983) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531355 · Cited by 1,123
Neotropical rainforest mammals: A field guide
Ayres, J. (1991) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(91)90062-3 · Cited by 873
Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture—recapture models
Karanth, K. U. (1995) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(94)00057-w · Cited by 658
A Common Rule for the Scaling of Carnivore Density
Carbone, C., & Gittleman, J. L. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067994 · Cited by 608
The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals
Carbone, C., Christie, S., Conforti, K., Coulson, T., Franklin, N., Ginsberg, J. R., Griffiths, M., Holden, J., Kawanishi, K., Kinnaird, M., et al. (2001) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1017/s1367943001001081 · Cited by 561
Cited by
Evaluating methods for counting cryptic carnivores
BALME, G. A., HUNTER, L. T. B., & SLOTOW, R. (2009) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/2007-368 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Bitetti, M. S., Paviolo, A., & De Angelo, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-24
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-163
- ISSN
- 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7998
- OpenAlex
- W2146893680
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00102.x
- The paper
- Di Bitetti, M. S., Paviolo, A., & De Angelo, C. (2006). Density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina. Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00102.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.