Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE EFFECT OF MYCORRHIZAL INFECTION ON THE RESPONSE OF BETULA PAPYRIFERA TO NICKEL AND COPPER

JONES, MELANIE D., HUTCHINSON, THOMAS C.·1986·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: The role of ectomycorrhizas in the metal tolerance of birch seedlings from Sudbury, Ontario was investigated. Betula papyrifera Marsh, is one of the few tree species able to survive in the copper‐ and nickel‐polluted area near Sudbury. Two types of birch seedlings were tested; those inoculated with Laccaria proxima (Boud.) Pat., Lactarius hibbardae Peck, Lactarius rufus (Scop, ex Fr.) Fries, or Scleroderma flavidum E. & E. isolates originating from the Sudbury area, and those which were not inoculated. Once the seedlings were infected, they were grown in sand culture containing 34 or 85 μM Ni, 32 or 63 Cu, or a control solution. At the low nickel concentration, the mycorrhizal plants, especially those infected with S. flavidum, grew significantly better than did non‐mycorrhizal plants. At the higher nickel concentration, S. flavidum‐infected seedlings weighed 86% of controls without nickel, while the other seedlings weighed only 52 to 61 % of control. The good growth of S. flavidum‐infected birch seedlings may have been due to retention of nickel in the mycorrhizas. These seedlings had the highest root nickel contents and the lowest stem nickel contents. At the high concentration of copper, growth of the mycorrhizal seedlings was significantly reduced compared with the non‐mycorrhizal seedlings. This reduction in growth of infected seedlings did not relate to an increase in the uptake or translocation of copper. Under the low copper treatment, infection with mycorrhizal fungi did not affect seedling growth. The potential role of iron and phosphorus in affecting host metal tolerance was investigated. Changes in the tissue concentrations of these elements did not relate to the effect of the fungi on metal tolerance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1986.tb00820.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
JONES, M. D., & HUTCHINSON, T. C.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-03
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
429-442
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2143041859
Cited by
174
References
1
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EFFECT OF MYCORRHIZAL INFECTION ON THE RESPONSE OF BETULA PAPYRIFERA TO NICKEL AND COPPER. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1986.tb00820.x
The paper
JONES, M. D., & HUTCHINSON, T. C. (1986). THE EFFECT OF MYCORRHIZAL INFECTION ON THE RESPONSE OF BETULA PAPYRIFERA TO NICKEL AND COPPER. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1986.tb00820.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.