The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE DEGRADATION OF CHLOROPHYLL — A BIOLOGICAL ENIGMA
Abstract
Summary: Some 10 9 tonnes of chlorophyll are destroyed each year on land and in the oceans. The fate of these chlorophylls is, however, largely unknown. This review describes the developmental stages at which chlorophyll breakdown occurs in aquatic and terrestrial biological systems, and the destruction arising from herbivory, disease, pollution and other physical hazards. At the cellular level, an attempt is made to separate the breakdown of chlorophyll during senescence from the many other events associated with cell destruction and death. A consideration of the more important chemical and biophysical properties of chlorophylls and their derivatives is provided, together with data on their spectral properties. The biosynthetic and biodegradative pathways of chlorophyll metabolism are, so far as is possible, described with some predictions as to the likely fate of the missing tonnes. Two types of degradation are recognized; the first involves up to five defined enzymes concerned with the early stages, the second covers the less well defined enzymic and non‐enzymic destruction of the macrocyclic structure. These degradative reactions are compared with the reactions implicated in the breakdown of other porphyrins including haems in plants and animals. A brief description is given of the occurrence of breakdown products of chlorophyll in past biomass, including those of geological significance and those in a more recent archaeological context. Finally, the economic significance of chlorophyll breakdown is considered in the context of agriculture and horticulture, veterinary and medical sciences, food colouring and cosmetic industries, and the multi‐million‐dollar attraction of autumn leaf fall to tourism. C ontentsSummary256I.Introduction256II.Chlorophylls: global production and destruction259III.Chlorophylls: nomenclature and chemical characteristics260IV.Chlorophyll metabolism268V.Chlorophyll degradation during senescence274VI.Other degradative conditions278VII.Breakdown products in past biomass287VIII.Pathways of degradation289IX.Economic importance291Acknowledgements294References294
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spectral absorption properties of ordinary and fully deuteriated chlorophylls a and b
Strain, H. H., Thomas, M. R., & Katz, J. J. (1963) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta · doi:10.1016/0006-3002(63)90617-6 · Cited by 153
Cited by
Matile, P., Hörtensteiner, S., & Thomas, H. (1999) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.67 · Cited by 515
Fang, Z., Bouwkamp, J. C., & Solomos, T. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/49.320.503 · Cited by 259
Niangoran, N. U. F., Buso, D., Zissis, G., & Prudhomme, T. (2021) · OCL · doi:10.1051/ocl/2021025 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendry, G. A. F., HOUGHTON, J. D., & BROWN, S. B.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-10
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 255-302
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1976083655
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE DEGRADATION OF CHLOROPHYLL — A BIOLOGICAL ENIGMA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00181.x
- The paper
- Hendry, G. A. F., HOUGHTON, J. D., & BROWN, S. B. (1987). THE DEGRADATION OF CHLOROPHYLL — A BIOLOGICAL ENIGMA. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00181.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.