The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A CHECK‐LIST OF MYCORRHIZA IN THE BRITISH FLORA*
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants
Wang, B., & Qiu, Y.-L. (2006) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-005-0033-6 · Cited by 1,920
VARIATION IN PLANT RESPONSE TO NATIVE AND EXOTIC ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI
Klironomos, J. N. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0413 · Cited by 1,213
Urban Ecology and Special Features of Urban Ecosystems
Rebele, F. (1994) · Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters · doi:10.2307/2997649 · Cited by 508
THE DISTRIBUTION OF MYCORRHIZAS AMONG FAMILIES OF VASCULAR PLANTS
NEWMAN, E. I., & REDDELL, P. (1987) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00175.x · Cited by 355
Global mycorrhizal plant distribution linked to terrestrial carbon stocks
Soudzilovskaia, N. A., van Bodegom, P. M., Terrer, C., Zelfde, M. V., McCallum, I., Luke McCormack, M., Fisher, J. B., Brundrett, M. C., de Sá, N. C., & Tedersoo, L. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13019-2 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- HARLEY, J. L., & HARLEY, E. L.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 1-102
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2117477188
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A CHECK‐LIST OF MYCORRHIZA IN THE BRITISH FLORA*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00674.x
- The paper
- HARLEY, J. L., & HARLEY, E. L. (1987). A CHECK‐LIST OF MYCORRHIZA IN THE BRITISH FLORA*. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00674.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
