The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The iron and molybdenum use efficiencies of plant growth with different energy, carbon and nitrogen sources
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Iron has many catalytic roles in photosynthesis, respiration and nitrogen assimilation; molybdenum is involved in NO 3 and (usually) N 2 reduction. This paper concentrates on computing the efficiency of use of Fe and Mo in growth of organisms growing with different mixtures of the major resources photons, carbon and nitrogen. This computed efficiency is defined as mol C assimilated (mol catalytic metal in the organism)‐1 s‐1. The efficiency is computed from the known in vivo involvement of Fe‐ and Mo‐containing enzymes, the specific reaction rate of these enzymes, the specific rate of these enzymes in vitro, and the growth requirements for the products of the reactions, for organisms using different energy, carbon and nitrogen sources. The predicted Fe use efficiency is greater for chemo‐organotrophic than for photolithotrophic growth with a given nitrogen source, and increases in the order N 2 NO 3‐ NH 4+ for growth with different nitrogen sources in the presence of constant photon and carbon availability. The predicted changes with variations in nitrogen source are greater than those with variations in photon and carbon source. These predicted values may be compared with observed metal use efficiencies, defined as mol C assimilated (mol total metal in the organism)‐1 s‐1. Relatively few such observed values are available From the literature. For Fe in photolithotrophically growing microalgae the observed values can be as low as 16–17% of the predicted values, i.e. 83–84% of the Fe in the organism is not accounted for by known catalytic uses of Fe if the catalysts are operating at their maximum specific reaction rates. One possibly discordant prediction relates to the Fe and Mo cost of N 2 fixation; the computations suggest that in vitro estimates of nitrogenase activity may be less than those sometimes found in vivo. The predictions also have possible implications for resource availability interactions (photons, carbon, nitrogen, Fe, Mo) in natural conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biogeochemical Controls and Feedbacks on Ocean Primary Production
Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T., & Smetacek, V. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.200 · Cited by 2,848
Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles
Arrigo, K. R. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04159 · Cited by 1,441
Iron uptake and growth limitation in oceanic and coastal phytoplankton
Sunda, W. G., & Huntsman, S. A. (1995) · Marine Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0304-4203(95)00035-p · Cited by 934
Interrelated influence of iron, light and cell size on marine phytoplankton growth
Sunda, W. G., & Huntsman, S. A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37093 · Cited by 759
Influence of iron availability on nutrient consumption ratio of diatoms in oceanic waters
Takeda, S. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31674 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- Raven, J. A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-287
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2051494658
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The iron and molybdenum use efficiencies of plant growth with different energy, carbon and nitrogen sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1988.tb04196.x
- The paper
- Raven, J. A. (1988). The iron and molybdenum use efficiencies of plant growth with different energy, carbon and nitrogen sources. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1988.tb04196.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.