The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular—arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Previously described methods to quantify the proportion of root length colonized by vesicular‐arbuscular (VA) mycorrhizal fungi are reviewed. It is argued that these methods give observer‐dependent measures of colonization which cannot be used to compare, quantitatively, roots examined by different researchers. A modified method is described here to estimate VA mycorrhizal colonization on an objective scale of measurement, involving inspection of intersections between the microscope eyepiece crosshair and roots at magnification × 200; it is referred to as the magnified intersections method. Whether the vertical eyepiece crosshair crosses one or more arbuscules is noted at each intersection. The estimate of colonization is the proportion of root length containing arbuscules, called the arbuscular colonization (AC). The magnified intersections method also determines the proportion of root length containing vesicles, the vesicular colonization (VC), and the proportion of root length containing hyphae, the hyphal colonization (HC). However, VC and HC should be interpreted with caution because vesicles and hyphae, unlike arbuscules, can be produced in roots by non‐mycorrhizal fungi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality
Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1320054111 · Cited by 2,550
Invasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826
“An approximately 1-g subsample of roots from each seedling was extracted, stained with Chlorazol Black E [37] and analyzed for percent colonization by AMF [38].”
MethodWilson, G. W. T., Rice, C. W., Rillig, M. C., Springer, A., & Hartnett, D. C. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01303.x · Cited by 826
Blackwell, P., Krull, E., Butler, G., Herbert, A., & Solaiman, Z. (2010) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr10014 · Cited by 243
Strigolactones and the Regulation of Pea Symbioses in Response to Nitrate and Phosphate Deficiency
Foo, E., Yoneyama, K., Hugill, C. J., Quittenden, L. J., & Reid, J. B. (2013) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1093/mp/sss115 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- McGONIGLE, T. P., MILLER, M. H., EVANS, D. G., FAIRCHILD, G. L., & SWAN, J. A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 495-501
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2146106266
- Cited by
- 3,878
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular—arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x
- The paper
- McGONIGLE, T. P., MILLER, M. H., EVANS, D. G., FAIRCHILD, G. L., & SWAN, J. A. (1990). A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular—arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.