The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tansley Review No. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants
Abstract
Summary: This review reports on the processes associated with carbon transfer and metabolism in leaves and growing organs and the role of long‐distance transport and vascular links in the regulation of carbon partitioning in plants. Partitioning is clearly influenced by both the supply and demand for photosynthate and is moderated by vascular connections and the storage capacity of the leaves and pathway tissues. However there appears to be little more than circumstantial evidence either that short distance transfer of carbon within either the source or the sink, or that long‐distance transport in the phloem, are limiting photosynthesis or growth directly. Although individual biochemical and physiological processes relating to photosynthesis and growth may be well understood, the factors primarily responsible for the control of carbon partitioning in plants have not been clearly identified. There is a need for a greater understanding of organ initiation and development (source and sink formation and potential size), the clear identification of whether growth is sink or source limited (including possible sink‐controlled photosynthesis) and a detailed assessment of the role of storage in buffering developmental and environmental changes in sink and source activity. Also more information is needed on the role of hormonal and nutritional factors in regulating source and sink activity (organ interactions not directly associated with carbon transfer). CONTENTSSummary341I.Introduction342II.General source‐sink relationships342III.Control at the source345IV.The utilization of photosynthate: sink characteristics and limitations353V.Vascular constraints and temporary storage360VI.Concluding comments366Acknowledgements366References367
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crop Productivity and Photoassimilate Partitioning
Gifford, R. M., Thorne, J. H., Hitz, W. D., & Giaquinta, R. T. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.225.4664.801 · Cited by 447
Cited by
CARBOHYDRATE-MODULATED GENE EXPRESSION IN PLANTS
Koch, K. E. (1996) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.509 · Cited by 1,766
Hammer, G. L., Dong, Z., McLean, G., Doherty, A., Messina, C., Schussler, J., Zinselmeier, C., Paszkiewicz, S., & Cooper, M. (2009) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0152 · Cited by 745
Sucrose is a signal molecule in assimilate partitioning
Chiou, T.-J., & Bush, D. R. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.8.4784 · Cited by 441
Phloem loading and unloading of sugars and amino acids
LALONDE, S., TEGEDER, M., THRONE‐HOLST, M., FROMMER, W. B., & PATRICK, J. W. (2003) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00847.x · Cited by 438
FARRAR, J. F., & WILLIAMS, M. L. (1991) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01445.x · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- WARDLAW, I. F.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-381
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2157874924
- Cited by
- 868
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tansley Review No. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00524.x
- The paper
- WARDLAW, I. F. (1990). Tansley Review No. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00524.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.