Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leaf fracture toughness and sclerophylly: their correlations and ecological implications

Open access
CHOONG, M. F., LUCAS, P. W., ONG, J. S. Y., PEREIRA, B., TAN, H. T. W., TURNER, I. M.·1992·New Phytologist

Abstract

summary: The fracture toughness of sun‐leaves of 42 tropical tree species growing in Singapore was measured along a ‘least tough’ path using an instrumented cutting technique. Punch‐and‐die (penetrometer) tests were also conducted. Intercostal material was analyzed for crude fibre and crude protein (total nitrogen concentration × 6.25) and the ratio of the two, the index of sclerophylly, calculated for each species. Leaf anatomy was examined and specific leaf area was calculated. Thirty‐seven of the species were from three definable plant communities, namely mangroves, trema belukar (secondary forest on undegraded sites) and adinandra belukar (secondary forest on highly degraded soils). There was a highly significant positive correlation between fracture toughness and index of sclerophylly for the 42 species (R2= 0.43, P < 0.001) brought about largely by a high correlation between toughness and crude fibre content. Fracture toughness was not correlated with lamina tissue dorsi‐ventral thickness but high toughness was clearly associated with the presence of sclerenchyma bundle sheaths and sheath extensions. Analysis of the fracture path for 26 leaves of ten mangrove species showed a high correlation between the area fraction occupied by veins and fracture toughness if one species, Avicennia rumphiana, was excluded. The regression equation for the other nine species gave estimates of the fracture toughness of vein tissue and lamina matrix of 6053 and 327 J m−2 respectively. Punch‐and‐die test results only correlated well with the cutting tests when values were divided by lamina thickness. The ratio of protein to fibre in a leaf (the reciprocal of the index of sclerophylly) has been established as a good predictor of leaf palatability and digestibility to generalist chewing folivores. The high correlation between fracture toughness and the index of sclerophylly for a large sample suggests that leaf toughness could be the factor used as a proximate cue for determining food quality in herbivore foraging strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01131.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
CHOONG, M. F., LUCAS, P. W., ONG, J. S. Y., PEREIRA, B., TAN, H. T. W., & TURNER, I. M.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-08
Volume
121
Issue
4
Pages
597-610
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W1980391480
Cited by
325
References
1
FWCI
13.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leaf fracture toughness and sclerophylly: their correlations and ecological implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01131.x
The paper
CHOONG, M. F., LUCAS, P. W., ONG, J. S. Y., PEREIRA, B., TAN, H. T. W., & TURNER, I. M. (1992). Leaf fracture toughness and sclerophylly: their correlations and ecological implications. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01131.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.