Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 683

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nutrient cycling in forests

Open access
ATTIWILL, PETER M., ADAMS, MARK A.·1993·New Phytologist

Abstract

SUMMARY: Studies of nutrient cycling in forests span more than 100 yr. In earlier years, most attention was given to the measurement of the pools of nutrients in plants and soil and of the return of nutrients from plant to soil in litterfall. The past 20 yr or so have seen a major concentration on the processes of nutrient cycling, with particular emphasis on those processes by which the supply of nutrients to the growing forest is sustained. In the more highly productive forests, up to 10 tonnes of litter of low nutritional quality is deposited annually on the forest floor. The decomposition of this litter, the mineralization of the nutrients it holds, and the uptake of nutrients by tree roots in the carbon‐rich environment which results are the themes of this review. Studies of decomposition of litter in forests have been dominated by the role of nitrogen as a limiting factor, a domination which reflects the preponderance of studies of temperate forests in the Northern Hemisphere. For many forests of the world growing on soils of considerable age, it seems more probable that growth and nutrient cycling are limited by phosphorus (or some other element). There is increasing evidence for a number of forests that phosphorus is immobilized in the first stages of decomposition to a significantly greater extent than is nitrogen. Advances in research will depend, as with studies of soil organic matter, in denning and developing analytical techniques for studying biologically active forms of potentially limiting nutrients, rather than total elemental concentrations. The availability of phosphorus in forests is sustained by phosphorus cycling. More than 50% of the total phosphorus in the surface soils is in organic forms and much of the more labile phosphorus is in the form of diesters. Phosphorus availability is determined by competition between biological and geochemical sinks, and it is clear that the sinks in the rhizosphere (plant roots, microorganisms, soil mineral and organic components) are extensively modified by active processes (e.g. production of exudates, nutrient storage in a variety of organic or polymeric forms and nutrient transport away from sites of uptake). There is abundant evidence that roots of many species exude compounds which have the ability to solubilize sources of phosphorus of otherwise low availability. The significance of root exudates (for example, phosphatases, organic acids) in the functioning of perennial ecosystems has yet to be quantified and there are conflicting reports as to the effects of simple organic acids on phosphorus availability. The distribution of phosphorus sinks and their relative competitiveness and their modification are topics of fundamental importance for future research. In contrast to the mineralization of phosphorus, our knowledge of transformations and availability of nitrogen in forest soils is well‐developed. Net nitrogen mineralization rates approximate rates of nitrogen return in litterfall but the contribution of nitrification is variable. Nitrification is not inhibited by the low pH of many forest soils and there is increasing evidence of nitrate immobilization by microorganisms and of increased diversity and better competitiveness for NH 4+of nitrifying microorganisms than has previously been accepted. Variability in rates of nitrification is often interpreted as being due to allelopathy. Hypotheses invoking allelopathy are more or less untestable, and it seems likely that new techniques using 15 N in situ will lead to a more fundamental understanding of nitrogen transformations in forest soils. Recent studies in coniferous forest soils have highlighted the short (< 1 d) turnover time of NH 4+. Finally, it seems that forest soils are resistant to major changes in patterns of nitrogen mineralization (and certainly, because of the large number of sinks, in patterns of phosphorus mineralization) following disturbance by natural events such as wind‐throw and fire, and by man‐made events such as logging and fertilizing. The long‐term disturbance by acid rain is a more complex matter since forest ecosystems are not adequate buffers for nitrate. ContentsSummary561I.Introduction562II.Linking nutrient cycling to nutrient availability – Setting the themes563III.The nature of soil organic matter566IV.Tree roots and the availability of nutrients566V.The decomposition of forest litter569VI.Mineralization of organically‐bound nutrients571Acknowledgements576References576

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03847.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 683

Metadata

Authors
ATTIWILL, P. M., & ADAMS, M. A.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-08
Volume
124
Issue
4
Pages
561-582
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2155621620
Cited by
683
References
4
FWCI
17.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient cycling in forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03847.x
The paper
ATTIWILL, P. M., & ADAMS, M. A. (1993). Nutrient cycling in forests. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03847.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.