Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 707

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tansley Review No. 71 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2on woody plants

CEULEMANS, REINHART, MOUSSEAU, MARIANNE·1994·New Phytologist

Abstract

summary: Because of their prominent role in the global carbon balance and their possible carbon sequestration, trees are very important organisms in relation to global climatic changes. Knowledge of these processes is the key to understanding the functioning of the whole forest ecosystem which can he modelled and predicted based on the physiological process information. This paper reviews the major methods and techniques used to examine the likely effects of elevated CO 2 on woody plants, as well as the major physiological responses of trees to elevated CO 2. The available exposure techniques and approaches are described. An overview table with all relevant literature data over the period 1989‐93 summarizes the percent changes in biomass, root/shoot ratio, photosynthesis, leaf area and water use efficiency under elevated CO 2. Interaction between growth, photosynthesis and nutrition is discussed with a special emphasis on downward regulation of photosynthesis. The stimulation or reduction found in the respiratory processes of woody plants are reviewed, as well as the effect of elevated CO 2 on stomatal density, conductance and water use efficiency. Changes in plant quality and their consequences are examined. Changes in underground processes under elevated CO 2 are especially emphasized and related to the functioning of the ecosystem. Some directions for future research are put forward. ContentsSummary425I.Introduction426II.The special case of trees426III.Methodologies, strategies and techniques427IV.Physiological responses of trees to elevated CO 2428V.Conclusions: Looking forward to the future at the ecosystem level441Acknowledgements442References442

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb03961.x

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 107 references

Cited by

See all 707

Metadata

Authors
CEULEMANS, R., & MOUSSEAU, M.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-06
Volume
127
Issue
3
Pages
425-446
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2124423037
Cited by
707
References
107
FWCI
53.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tansley Review No. 71 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2on woody plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb03961.x
The paper
CEULEMANS, R., & MOUSSEAU, M. (1994). Tansley Review No. 71 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2on woody plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb03961.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.