Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 602

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antioxidant responses to drought in sunflower and sorghum seedlings

ZHANG, JINGXIAN, KIRKHAM, M. B.·1996·New Phytologist

Abstract

summary: To determine if antioxidant responses to drought differ between C 3 and C 4 plants, we grew Sorghum bicolor (C 4) and Helianthus annuus (C 3) under either watered or dry conditions in a growth chamber. Levels of leaf enzymatic antioxidants (ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, guaiacol peroxidase, dehydroascorbate reductase, monodehydroascorbate reductase, glutathione reductase and superoxide dismutase), nonenzymatic antioxidants (ascorbate, glutathione and carotenoids) and stress parameters (Chl and malondialdehyde [MDA]) were determined. Under watered and drought conditions, Chl contents and leaf relative water contents (RWC) were higher in sorghum than in sunflower; however, MDA levels were higher in sunflower than in sorghum. Under watered conditions, inherent levels of antioxidants were not consistently higher or lower in sorghum than in sunflower. In response to drought, levels of antioxidants, Chl and MDA showed increase, decrease or remained unchanged depending on crop, duration of drought and kind of antioxidants. Duration of drought was divided arbitrarily into three stages. At an early stage of drought (watering had stopped for 3–4 d) when soil water content (WC) and leaf RWC had decreased only in sunflower, drought generally did not affect levels of antioxidants and stress parameters. At a middle stage of drought (watering had stopped for 5–6 d) when soil WC had decreased for both sorghum and sunflower but leaf WC and RWC had decreased only in sunflower, drought changed levels of some antioxidants in sunflower and sorghum. At a late stage of drought (watering had stopped for 7–8 d) when soil WC, leaf WC and RWC had decreased in sorghum and sunflower, most parameters studied were affected by drought. Because of the differential effect of drought, levels of antioxidants were not consistently higher or lower in sorghum than in sunflower under drought. These results show that, under both drought and watered conditions, sorghum does not have consistently higher or lower antioxidant levels than sunflower, and that antioxidant responses to drought differ in C 3 and C 4 plants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01856.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
ZHANG, J., & KIRKHAM, M. B.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-03
Volume
132
Issue
3
Pages
361-373
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2053267259
Cited by
602
References
3
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antioxidant responses to drought in sunflower and sorghum seedlings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01856.x
The paper
ZHANG, J., & KIRKHAM, M. B. (1996). Antioxidant responses to drought in sunflower and sorghum seedlings. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01856.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.