The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at different soil depths in extensively and intensively managed agroecosystems
Abstract
The vertical distribution of spores of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was investigated in soil profiles of extensively and intensively managed agroecosystems, including two permanent grasslands, a vineyard and two continuously mono-cropped maize fields. The number of AMF spores decreased with increasing soil depth--most drastically in the grasslands and the vineyard--but there was a large diversity of AMF species even in the deepest soil layers (50-70 cm). This was particularly striking in the maize fields where the highest species numbers were found below ploughing depth. Some species sporulated mainly, or exclusively, in the deep soil layers, others mainly in the top layers. Soil samples were used to inoculate trap cultures. Up to 18 months after inoculation, there was no conspicuous difference in the species composition among the trap cultures representing different soil depths, and only a weak match to the species composition determined by analysis of field samples. Our results indicate that the AMF communities in deep soil layers are surprisingly diverse and different from the topsoil. Thus, deep soil layers should be included in studies to get a complete picture of AMF diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resource type and availability regulate fungal communities along arable soil profiles
Moll, J., Goldmann, K., Kramer, S., Hempel, S., Kandeler, E., Marhan, S., Ruess, L., Krüger, D., & Buscot, F. (2015) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-015-0569-8 · Cited by 45
Cheeke, T. E., Cruzan, M. B., & Rosenstiel, T. N. (2013) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00702-13 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Oehl, F., Sieverding, E., Ineichen, K., Ris, E., Boller, T., & Wiemken, A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12-09
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 273-283
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2002887088
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.