The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The light‐hyperresponsive high pigment‐2dg mutation of tomato: alterations in the fruit metabolome
Open accessAbstract
Overall metabolic modifications between fruit of light-hyperresponsive high-pigment (hp) tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) mutant plants and isogenic nonmutant (wt) control plants were compared. Targeted metabolite analyses, as well as large-scale nontargeted mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolite profiling, were used to phenotype the differences in fruit metabolite composition. Targeted high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (HPLC-PDA) metabolite analyses showed higher levels of isoprenoids and phenolic compounds in hp-2dg fruit. Nontargeted GC-MS profiling of red fruits produced 25 volatile compounds that showed a 1.5-fold difference between the genotypes. Analyses of red fruits using HPLC coupled to high-resolution quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) in both ESI-positive and ESI-negative mode generated, respectively, 6168 and 5401 mass signals, of which 142 and 303 showed a twofold difference between the genotypes. hp-2dg fruits are characterized by overproduction of many metabolites, several of which are known for their antioxidant or photoprotective activities. These metabolites may now be more closely implicated as resources recruited by plants to respond to and manage light stress. The similarity in metabolic alterations in fruits of hp-1 and hp-2 mutant plants helps us to understand how hp mutations affect cellular processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
White, P. J., & Broadley, M. R. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x · Cited by 2,178
Data processing for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics
Katajamaa, M., & Orešič, M. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.021 · Cited by 616
Biogenesis, molecular regulation and function of plant isoprenoids.
Bouvier, F., Rahier, A., & Camara, B. (2005) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2005.09.003 · Cited by 498
López‐Ráez, J. A., Charnikhova, T., Gómez‐Roldán, V., Matusova, R., Kohlen, W., De Vos, R., Verstappen, F., Puech‐Pages, V., Bécard, G., Mulder, P., et al. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02406.x · Cited by 495
Changes in Antioxidant and Metabolite Profiles during Production of Tomato Paste
Capanoglu, E., Beekwilder, J., Boyacioglu, D., Hall, R., & de Vos, R. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf072990e · Cited by 361
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bino, R. J., De Vos, C. H. R., Lieberman, M., Hall, R. D., Bovy, A., Jonker, H. H., Tikunov, Y., Lommen, A., Moco, S., & Levin, I.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-23
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 427-438
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2164412968
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The light‐hyperresponsive high pigment‐2dg mutation of tomato: alterations in the fruit metabolome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01362.x
- The paper
- Bino, R. J., De Vos, C. H. R., Lieberman, M., Hall, R. D., Bovy, A., Jonker, H. H., Tikunov, Y., Lommen, A., Moco, S., & Levin, I. (2005). The light‐hyperresponsive high pigment‐2dg mutation of tomato: alterations in the fruit metabolome. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01362.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.