The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is plant performance limited by abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? A meta‐analysis of studies published between 1988 and 2003
Abstract
We conducted meta-analyses of 290 published field and glasshouse trials to determine the effects of various agricultural practices on mycorrhizal colonization in nonsterile soils, and the consequence of those effects on yield, biomass, and phosphorus (P) concentration. Mycorrhizal colonization was increased most by inoculation (29% increase), followed by shortened fallow (20%) and reduced soil disturbance (7%). The effect of crop rotation depended on whether the crop was mycorrhizal. Increased colonization resulted in a yield increase in the field of 23% across all management practices. Biomass at harvest and shoot P concentration in early season were increased by inoculation (57 and 33%, respectively) and shortened fallow (55 and 24%). Reduced disturbance increased shoot P concentration by 27%, but biomass was not significantly affected. Biomass was significantly reduced in 2% of all trials in which there was a significant increase in colonization. Irrespective of management practice, an increased mycorrhizal colonization was less likely to increase biomass if either soil P or indigenous inoculum potential was high.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704
Cited by
A meta‐analysis of context‐dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi
Hoeksema, J. D., Chaudhary, V. B., Gehring, C. A., Johnson, N. C., Karst, J., Koide, R. T., Pringle, A., Zabinski, C., Bever, J. D., Moore, J. C., et al. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01430.x · Cited by 1,199
Self-citationSoil microbiomes and one health
Banerjee, S., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00779-w · Cited by 905
A meta‐analysis of plant responses to dark septate root endophytes
Newsham, K. K. (2011) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03611.x · Cited by 665
Mycorrhizas and tropical soil fertility
Cardoso, I. M., & Kuyper, T. W. (2006) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.011 · Cited by 428
Microbial ecology of biological invasions
van der Putten, W. H., Klironomos, J. N., & Wardle, D. A. (2007) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2007.9 · Cited by 416
Metadata
- Authors
- Lekberg, Y., & Koide, R. T.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 189-204
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2158759946
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is plant performance limited by abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? A meta‐analysis of studies published between 1988 and 2003. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01490.x
- The paper
- Lekberg, Y., & Koide, R. T. (2005). Is plant performance limited by abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? A meta‐analysis of studies published between 1988 and 2003. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01490.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.