The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal nitrogen allocation controls tree responses to elevated CO2
Open accessAbstract
Despite the abundance of experimental data, understanding of forest responses to elevated CO2 is limited. Here I show that a key to previously unexplained production and leaf area responses lies in the interplay between whole-plant nitrogen (N) allocation and leaf photosynthesis. A simple tree growth model, controlled by net growth maximization through optimization of leaf area index (LAI) and plant N, is used to analyse CO2 responses in both young, expanding and closed, steady-state canopies. The responses are sensitive to only two independent parameters, the photosynthetic capacity per leaf N (a) and the fine-root N:leaf N ratio. The model explains observed CO2 responses of photosynthesis, production and LAI in four forest free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. Insensitivity of LAI except at low LAI, increase in light-use efficiency, and photosynthetic down-regulation (as a result of reduced leaf N per area) at elevated CO2 are all explained through the combined effects on a and leaf quantum efficiency. The model bridges the gap between the understanding of leaf-level and plant-level responses and provides a transparent framework for interpreting and linking structural (LAI) and functional (net primary production (NPP):gross primary production (GPP) ratio, light-use efficiency, photosynthetic down-regulation) responses to elevated CO2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Cited by
Lavallee, J. M., Soong, J. L., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14859 · Cited by 2,477
Fate of soil‐applied black carbon: downward migration, leaching and soil respiration
MAJOR, J., LEHMANN, J., RONDON, M., & GOODALE, C. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02044.x · Cited by 788
A global perspective on belowground carbon dynamics under nitrogen enrichment
Liu, L., & Greaver, T. L. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01482.x · Cited by 756
Sokol, N. W., Kuebbing, S. E., Karlsen‐Ayala, E., & Bradford, M. A. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15361 · Cited by 631
Finzi, A. C., Abramoff, R. Z., Spiller, K. S., Brzostek, E. R., Darby, B. A., Kramer, M. A., & Phillips, R. P. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12816 · Cited by 630
Metadata
- Authors
- Franklin, O.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-05
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 811-822
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2111171083
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal nitrogen allocation controls tree responses to elevated CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02063.x
- The paper
- Franklin, O. (2007). Optimal nitrogen allocation controls tree responses to elevated CO2. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02063.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.